CAS 2016_A_4708 Belarus Canoe Association & Belarusian Senior Men’s Canoe and Kayak team members vs ICF

CAS 2016/A/4708 Belarus Canoe Association & Belarusian Senior Men’s Canoe and Kayak team members v. International Canoe Federation (ICF)

The members of the Belarusian senior men’s kayak team:
- Mr. Raman Piatrushenka,
- Mr. Vitaliy Bialko,
- Mr. Aleh Yurenia,
- Mr. Pavel Miadzvedzeu,
- Mr. Vadzim Makhneu,
- Mr. Taras Valko,
- Mr. Aliaksandr Liapeshka,
- Mr. Andrei Tsarykovich,
- Mr. Ihar Baicheuski,
- Mr. Ivan Tsuranau,
- Mr. Dzmitry Khilchanka,
- Mr. Spartak Bazhkou,
- Mr. Mikita Borykau,
- Mr. Stanislau Daineka,
- Mr. Dzimtry Tratsiakou.

The members of the Belarusian senior men’s canoe team:
- Mr. Aliaksandr Bahdanovich,
- Mr. Andrei Bahdanovich,
- Mr. Dzianis Harazha,
- Mr. Dzmitry Rabchanka,
- Mr. Dzmitry Vaitsishkin,
- Mr. Artsem Kozyr,
- Mr. Maksim Piatrou,
- Mr. Hleb Saladukha,
- Mr. Dzianis Makhlai,
- Mr. Aliaksandr Vauchetski),

The Belarussian coaches:
- Mr. Uladzimir Shantarovich,
- Mr. Mikalai Banko,
- Mr. Ihar Radomski,
- Mr. Henadzi Halitski.

The Belarussian medical staff of these male teams:
- Mrs. Elena Kallaur,
- Mr. Aliaksei Roik.
_________________________________________________

On 12 April 2016, French Police and Customs raided the rooms and personal belongings of the male Belarusian canoe athletes at the training camp in Le Temple-sur-Lot (France). They confiscated various substances, medication, material and medical equipment, including meldonium, needles and other equipment for transfusions, Actovegin and iron supplements. The meldonium (16 capsules of Mildronate) were found in the room of Mr. Henadzi Halitski, the coach of the Belarusian women’s kayak team.

Seventeen athletes from the Belarus canoe team underwent a doping control and urine samples were taken from them. Meldonium was found in five of these samples and the French Ministry of Justice openened a criminal case against the Belarussian team. Only one sample showed a concentration above the WADA threshold and the Belarus Canoe Association (BCA) suspended the athlete from any competition.

The BCA expressed to the International Canoe Federation (ICF) its intention to support doping free sport. The BCA argued that the import of certain medicines was only a violation of customs rules and explained with evidence that the use and possession of the medication was valid. It asserted that the seized Mildranat was prescribed and used by Henadzi Halitski the coach of the Belarus’ women’s team.

Considering the results of the French raid into the training camp the ICF Executive Committee concluded that there was enough evidence and proof to issue sanctions against the athletes, coaches and entourage of the Belarus delegation.

The ICF Executive Committee decided on 15 July 2016 to impose a 1 year period of ineligibility on the Senior Men’s Canoe and Kayak teams including coaches, medical staff and entourage for all international competitions. The starting date for this sanction would be 13 July 2016.

Hereafter in July 2016 the Appellants appealed the ICF decision of 15 July 2016 with the Court of Arbitation for Sport (CAS). The BCA argued that the ICF Executive Committee was not entitled to issue the Decision and it violated the relevant Rules and procedural rights of the Athletes.

The Panel finds that the ICF Decision of 15 July 2016 to the exclusion (ban) was not restricted to officials only and disregarding two further restrictions.
Having not been provided with evidence by the ICF to its comfortable satisfaction that the BCA Athletes took meldonium after 1 January 2016, the Panel holds that there was no anti-doping rule violation committed by the athletes as to meldonium.

Besides, the ICF Executive Committee erred in the Appealed Decision in holding that meldonium was in the possession of the Belarus contingent, which, thus, committed a violation of Article 2.6.2 ICF ADR. The coach Mr. Halitski could explain to the Panel on a balance of probability and even to its comfortable satisfaction that the meldonium was in his possession for personal medical reasons. Since there is no obligation for a Therapeutic Use Exemption for coaches in place under the WADA Code and the ICF ADR, the Panel finds that Article 2.6.2 ICF ADR has not been violated by such possession.

The ICF could not establish to the comfortable satisfaction of the Panel that the transfusion equipment and medication found at the raid of the BCA’s training camp in France, as far as disclosed to the Panel, served the aims of prohibited methods. Thus, the Panel finds that no violation of Article 2.6.2 ICF ADR took place. There was no possession of prohibited methods, regardless of the question whether Article 2.6.2 ICF ADR is clear and precise enough at all because it does not determine under which conditions and from when a person has possession of a prohibited method.

Since there were not four or more violations of the ICF ADR (other than violations involving Article 2.4) committed by Athletes or other Persons affiliated with the BCA within a 12-month period in testing conducted by the ICF or Anti-Doping Organisations other than the BCA or BCA’s National Anti-Doping Organisation, the Panel finds that Article 12.3 ICF ADR, read together with Sub-Article 12.3.1 could not be applied on the BCA, based on the established facts. As a result, the Appealed Decision of the ICF Executive Committee is set aside.

In conclusion, the Panel finds that the Appealed Decision is also set aside as premature because there were no previous decisions taken by the ICF Doping Control Panel on violations of the ICF ADR by Athletes or other Persons affiliated with the BCA.

Therefore the Court of Arbitration for Sport decides on 23 January 2017:

1.) The appeal filed by the Belarus Canoe Association and the Belarusian senior men’s canoe and kayak team members against the decision rendered on 15 July 2016 by the ICF Executive Committee is upheld.
2.) The decision of the Executive Committee of the International Canoe Federation rendered on 15 July 2016 is set aside.
3.) The present award is rendered without costs, except for the Court Office fee of CHF 1,000 (one thousand Swiss francs), which has already been paid by the Belarus Canoe Association and is retained by the Court of Arbitration for Sport.
4.) (…).
5.) All other motions or prayers for relief are dismissed.

show »
Type:
pdf

Parameters:

Doping classes
S4. Hormone And Metabolic Modulators
Laboratories
Paris (FRA)
Legal
CAS Appeal Awards
Date:
23 January 2017
Arbitrator
Geistlinger, Michael
Schimke, Martin
Subiotto, Romano F.
Source
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport (TAS) - Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)
Country
Belarus
Language
English
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding
Possession
Document type
pdf
Health/Medical
Legitimate Medical Treatment
IF'S
Canoe (ICF) - International Canoe Federation
Legal Terms
Circumstantial evidence
Consequences to teams
Criminal Investigation
De novo hearing
Jurisdiction
Jurisprudence
Model Rules, Guidelines and Protocols WADA
Multiple Violations
Right to be heard
Rules & regulations International Sports Federations
WADA Prohibited List International Standard
Organisations
Белорусская Aссоциация Kаноэ (БAK) - Belarus Canoe Association (BCA)
Substances
Meldonium
Various
Athlete support personnel
Out-of-Competition Use
Category
  • (Medical) Science
  • Doping classes
  • Education
  • History
  • Laboratories
  • Legal
  • Statistics
Publication period
Origin
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Document category
  • Document type
  • Health/Medical
  • IF'S
  • Laboratories/Analysis
  • Legal Terms
  • Organisations
  • Substances
  • Various
  • Version