CCES 2015 CCES vs Curtis Moss

In June 2015 the Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport (CCES) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Curtis Moss after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance Methylphenidate.

After notification the Athlete gave a prompt admission, waived his right to be heard and accepted the sanction proposed by the CCES. The Athlete explained that he had used the substance as medication prescribed by his physician and applied for a TUE which was approved by the CCES.

The CCES established that the Athlete was not at significant fault or negligence for the violation and decides on 14 December 2015 to impose a 2 month period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on 4 January 2016.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
14 December 2015
Original Source
Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport (CCES)
Country
Canada
Language
English
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Legal Terms
Acceptance of sanction
No intention to enhance performance
No Significant Fault or Negligence
Period of ineligibility
Prompt / Timely Admission
Waiver of "right to be heard"
Sport/IFs
Athletics (WA) - World Athletics
Other organisations
Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport (CCES)
Laboratories
Montreal, Canada: Laboratoire de controle du dopage INRS-Institut Armand-Frappier
Doping classes
S6. Stimulants
Substances
Methylphenidate
Medical terms
Legitimate Medical Treatment
Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE)
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
21 June 2017
Date of last modification
26 June 2017
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin