CCES 2016 CCES vs Nicola Terbasket

In April 2016 the Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport (CCES) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after her samples tested positive for the prohibited substance Cannabis.
After notification the Athlete gave a prompt admission, waived her right to be heard accepted the provisional suspension and the sanction proposed by the CCES.

The CCES established that the young Athlete was not at significant fault or negligence for the violation and when tested the Athlete was not a National or International athlete as defined under the Rules. The Athlete’s use of Cannabis occurred out-of-competition and weeks prior to the sample collection.

Therefore the CCES decides on 6 June 2016 to impose a 2 month period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the sample collection, i.e. on 19 March 2016.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
6 June 2016
Original Source
Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport (CCES)
Country
Canada
Language
English
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Legal Terms
Acceptance of sanction
No Significant Fault or Negligence
Period of ineligibility
Prompt / Timely Admission
Waiver of "right to be heard"
Sport/IFs
Basketball (FIBA) - International Basketball Federation
Other organisations
Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport (CCES)
Laboratories
Montreal, Canada: Laboratoire de controle du dopage INRS-Institut Armand-Frappier
Doping classes
S8. Cannabinoids
Substances
Cannabis (THC)
Various
Out-of-competition use / Substances of Abuse
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
21 June 2017
Date of last modification
12 April 2018
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin