NADO Flanders 2016-024 Joe Fournier vs NADO Flanders - Appeal (Translation UKAD)

Related case:
NADO Flanders 2016-024 Joe Fournier vs NADO Flanders - Appeal

On 30 March 2017 United Kingdom Anti-Doping (UKAD) published the original appeal decision of the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Council about the Athlete Joe Fournier and its translation of the decision on the UKAD website.


On 6 December 2016 the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decided to impose a € 4000,- fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Britsh boxer after his A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substance sibutramine.

Hereafter the Athlete appealed the decision of 6 December 2016 with the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Council. The Athlete filed several objections in his defence against the previous decision and he was heard for the Disciplinary Council.

At first the Athlete challenged the validity of the test results but pending the appeal he accepted these results.
Instead the Athlete could produce evidence demonstrating that the prohibited substance entered his system due to the dietary supplement ‘Perferct Shape’. The supplement in this matter was used out-of-competition and mentioned on the Doping Control Form as recommended and provided by his trainer. The filed analysis reports of the this supplement showed that the was contaminated and the presence of the substance sibutramine wasn’t mentioned as ingredient on the label of the product.

On the basis of the new evidence the Disciplinary Council finds that the Athlete has established that the prohibited substance entered his system through the use of the contaminated supplement.
Considering the Athlete’s degree of fault in this case and without intention to enhance sport performance the Disciplinary Council concludes that there are grounds for a reduced sanction.

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Council decides to partially reform the decision of the Disciplinary Commission of 6 December 2016 and to reduce the imposed sanction of 4 years to a 18 month period of ineligibility starting on 6 December 2016.

Fees and expenses for this Council shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
3 March 2017
Arbitrator
Buyle, P.
De Croock, Guido
Renson, Luc
Original Source
NADO Vlaanderen - National Anti-Doping Organisation Flanders (NADO Flanders)
UK Anti-Doping (UKAD)
Country
Belgium
United Kingdom
Language
English
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Legal Terms
Circumstantial evidence
Fine
No intention to enhance performance
No Significant Fault or Negligence
Period of ineligibility
Worldwide adoption of sanction
Sport/IFs
Boxing (IBA) - International Boxing Association
Other organisations
NADO Vlaanderen - National Anti-Doping Organisation Flanders (NADO Flanders)
UK Anti-Doping (UKAD)
Laboratories
Ghent, Belgium: DoCoLab Universiteit Gent-UGent
Analytical aspects
B sample analysis
Reliability of the testing method / testing result
Doping classes
S6. Stimulants
Substances
Sibutramine
Various
Amateur / club / recreational sport
Athlete support personnel
Contamination
Out-of-competition use / Substances of Abuse
Supplements
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
29 June 2017
Date of last modification
1 May 2018
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin