Welcome

Welcome to Doping.nl, the Anti-Doping Knowledge Center.
This site has been established to host information about doping in the broadest sense of the word, and about doping prevention.

Initiator
The Anti-Doping Authority Netherlands (the Dutch Doping Authority for short) established this site and maintains it. The Doping Authority was founded in 1989 and it is one of the oldest NADOs in the world. Doping.nl was developed with financial support from the Dutch Ministry for Health, Welfare and Sport.

Goals
This website  was established because of the importance that the Doping Authority and the Ministry attach to the dissemination of information relevant to doping prevention. Disclosing and supplying relevant information is one of the cornerstones in the fight against doping in sport. However, in practice, a significant amount of information is still not available, or only available to a limited group of users. We therefore decided to bring together all the relevant information in a single site: Doping.nl.

Activities
The Doping Authority aims to supply as much information through this website as possible on an ongoing basis. The information will be varied but will focus primarily on: WADA documents like the World Anti-Doping Code, the International Standards like the Prohibited List, Doping Regulations, scientific articles and abstracts, decisions by disciplinary bodies (mainly CAS decisions).As well as making documents available, the Doping Authority aims to supply searchable documents when possible, and to add relevant keywords to ensure easy access.
In the future, Doping.nl will also become a digital archive containing older information that is no longer available elsewhere.

Target readers
This site has been designed for use by anti-doping professionals such as National Anti-Doping Organisations and International Federations but also for students, journalists and other people interested in the subject.

Register
To use the lightbox option, you need to register.

More information explaining how to use this website can be found under "help".

Recently added documents More »

ISADAP 2017 ISADDP Appeal Decision 20164962 - Appeal

Related case: GAAADHC 2016 SI Diciplinary Decision 20164962 February 27, 2017 In May 2016 Sport Ireland (Spórt Éireann) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete IS-4962 after his A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substance Methylhexaneamine (dimethylpentylamine). The Athlete admitted the violation and denied the intentional use of the substance. He stated that he purchased caffeine tablets Falcon Labs Oxy Burn Pro recommended by a casual friend. He asserted that he researched the ingredients of the product on the internet before using, the prohibited substance was not mentioned on the label of the product and he mentioned these caffeine tablets on the Doping Control Form. The GAA Anti-Doping Hearing Committee considered that the Athlete’s violation was not intentional, that he researched the product before using, admitted the violation and explained how the substance came into his system. The Athlete’s conduct showed also that he was educated enough to be aware of the existence of doping and the need to check his supplements. However he purchased the supplement following the recommendation of a casual friend and failed to consult the nutritionist or his own general practitioner about this product. Establishing No Significant Fault or Negligence for the Athlete’s conduct the GAA Anti-Doping Hearing Committee decided on 27 February 2017 to impose a 6 month period of ineligibility on the Athlete IS-4962. The sanction started on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. 13 May 2016 and is without the 11 weeks he has already served. Herafter in March 2017 the Athlete appealed the decision of the GAA Anti-Doping Hearing Committee with the Irish Sport Anti-Doping Appeal Panel (ISADAP). The Appeal Panel reviewed the positive and negative factors considered by the GAA Anti-Doping Hearing Committee and finds that the Committee may have given slightly too much weight to the negative factors and not quite enough weight tot the positive factors in favour of the Athlete. Therefore the ISADAP decides on 31 May 2017 that the imposed period of ineligibility by the Committee of 6 months should be reducted from 26 to 21 weeks. With the time already served the Athlete can return to training with immediate effect.

show » details »
Type:
pdf

GAAADHC 2016 SI Diciplinary Decision 20164962

Related case: ISADAP 2017 ISADDP Appeal Decision 20164962 - Appeal May 31, 2017 In May 2016 Sport Ireland (Spórt Éireann) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete IS-4962 after his A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substance Methylhexaneamine (dimethylpentylamine). After notification a provisional suspension was ordered. The Athlete filed a statement in his defence, he did not accept the sanction proposed by Sport Ireland and was heard for the GAA Anti-Doping Hearing Committee. The Athlete admitted the violation and denied the intentional use of the substance. He stated that had used a number of supplements provided by the regular nutritionist. Because he didn’t like the caffeine gel he purchased caffeine tablets Falcon Labs Oxy Burn Pro recommended by a casual friend. He asserted that he researched the ingredients of the product on the internet before using and mentioned these caffeine tablets on the Doping Control Form. In fact the Oxy Burn Pro contained the prohibited substance as source of the positive test and it was not mentioned on the label of the product. He didn’t consult the nutritionist nor his general practitioner about the new product. The Athlete mentioned the lack of anti-doping information he received and the Hearing Committee finds that there was a confusing situation at the Kerry County Board about what players were told and the level of anti-doping instruction and education provided to the players. The Committee considers that the Athlete’s violation was not intentional, that he researched the product before using, admitted the violation and explained how the substance came into his system. The Athlete’s conduct showed also that he was educated enough to be aware of the existence of doping and the need to check his supplements. However he purchased the supplement following the recommendation of a casual friend and failed to consult the nutritionist or his own general practitioner about this product. Establishing No Significant Fault or Negligence for the Athlete’s conduct the GAA Anti-Doping Hearing Committee decides on 27 February 2017 to impose a 6 month period of ineligibility on the Athlete IS-4962. The sanction will start on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. 13 May 2016 and is without the 11 weeks he has already served.

show » details »
Type:
pdf

UKAD 2017 UKAD vs Robert Myring-Thomson

In February 2017, UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) was informed that the UK Border Forced had intercepted and seized a package addressed to the Athlete Robert Myring-Thomson and contained about 100 tablets of Stanozolol. After notification in March 2017 a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete was heard by UKAD. The Athlete gave a prompt admission and without a hearing he accepted a 4 year period of ineligibility. The Athlete stated that ordered the product contained in the package for his own personal use, knowing that the product was or contained a Prohibited Substance. WADA, UKAD and the IAAF agree that the should not be afforded a reduction in the period of Ineligibility based on his degree of Fault. Therefor UKAD decides on 12 September 2017 to impose a 4 year period of ineligiblility on the Athlete starting on the date of the interception and seizure of the Athlete’s package, i.e. on 20 February 2017.

show » details »
Type:
pdf

FINA 2017 FINA vs Thomas Fraser-Holmes.

In February 2017 the International Swimming Federation (FINA) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Australian swimmer Thomas Fraser-Holmes for three missed tests within a 12 month period (September 2016 - February 2017). On 7 June 2017 the FINA Doping Panel decides to impose a 1 year period of inelgibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the decision.

show » details »
Type:
pdf
Category
  • (Medical) Science
  • Doping classes
  • Education
  • History
  • Laboratories
  • Legal
  • Statistics
Publication period
Origin
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Document category
  • Document type
  • Health/Medical
  • IF'S
  • Laboratories/Analysis
  • Legal Terms
  • Organisations
  • Substances
  • Various
  • Version