Welcome

Welcome to Doping.nl, the Anti-Doping Knowledge Center.
This site has been established to host information about doping in the broadest sense of the word, and about doping prevention.

Initiator
The Anti-Doping Authority Netherlands (the Dutch Doping Authority for short) established this site and maintains it. The Doping Authority was founded in 1989 and it is one of the oldest NADOs in the world. Doping.nl was developed with financial support from the Dutch Ministry for Health, Welfare and Sport.

Goals
This website  was established because of the importance that the Doping Authority and the Ministry attach to the dissemination of information relevant to doping prevention. Disclosing and supplying relevant information is one of the cornerstones in the fight against doping in sport. However, in practice, a significant amount of information is still not available, or only available to a limited group of users. We therefore decided to bring together all the relevant information in a single site: Doping.nl.

Activities
The Doping Authority aims to supply as much information through this website as possible on an ongoing basis. The information will be varied but will focus primarily on: WADA documents like the World Anti-Doping Code, the International Standards like the Prohibited List, Doping Regulations, scientific articles and abstracts, decisions by disciplinary bodies (mainly CAS decisions).As well as making documents available, the Doping Authority aims to supply searchable documents when possible, and to add relevant keywords to ensure easy access.
In the future, Doping.nl will also become a digital archive containing older information that is no longer available elsewhere.

Target readers
This site has been designed for use by anti-doping professionals such as National Anti-Doping Organisations and International Federations but also for students, journalists and other people interested in the subject.

Register
To use the lightbox option, you need to register.

More information explaining how to use this website can be found under "help".

Recently added documents More »

IOC 2016 IOC vs Nastassia Mironchyk Ivanova

Ms. Nastassia Mironchyk-Ivanova is a Belarussian Athlete competing in the Women’s long jump athletics event at the London 2012 Olympic Games. In 2016, the IOC decided to perform further analyses on certain samples collected during the 2012 Olympic Games. These additional analyses were performed with analytical methods which were not available in 2012. In May 2016 the International Olympic Committee reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after her 2012 A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substance dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (turinabol). After notification the Athlete submitted that she did not challenge the test results and she waived her right to be heard for the IOC Disciplinary Commission. The Commission finds that the Athlete did not challenge the test results and concludes that the Athlete has committed an anti-doping rule violation consistent with intentional use of a prohibited substance specifically ingested to deliberately improve performance. The fact that the metabolite of a doping substance, which is a “classical” doping substance, was found, supports this consideration. Therefore the IOC Disciplinary Commission decides on 22 November 2016 that the Athlete, Nastassia Mironchyk-Ivanova: 1.) is found to have committed an anti-doping rule violation pursuant to the IOC Anti-Doping Rules applicable to the Games of the XXX Olympiad in London 2012, 2.) is disqualified from the Women’s long jump event in which she participated upon the occasion of the Olympic Games London 2012, 3.) has the diploma obtained in the Women’s long jump event withdrawn and is ordered to return the same. 4.) The IAAF is requested to modify the results of the above-mentioned event accordingly and to consider any further action within its own competence. 5.) The National Olympic Committee of the Republic of Belarus shall ensure full implementation of this decision. 6.) The National Olympic Committee of the Republic of Belarus shall notably secure the return to the IOC, as soon as possible, of the diploma awarded in connection with the Women’s long jump event to the Athlete. 7.) This decision enters into force immediately.

show » details »
Type:
pdf

IOC 2016 IOC vs Boyanka Kostova

Ms. Boyanka Kostova is an Azerbaijani Athlete competing in the Women’s 58 kg weightlifting event at the London 2012 Olympic Games. In 2016, the IOC decided to perform further analyses on certain samples collected during the 2012 Olympic Games. These additional analyses were performed with analytical methods which were not available in 2012. In May 2016 the International Olympic Committee reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after her 2012 A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substances dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (turinabol) and stanozolol. After notification the Athlete submitted that she did not challenge the test results and she waived his right to be heard for the IOC Disciplinary Commission. The Commission finds that the Athlete did not challenge the test results and concludes that the Athlete has committed an anti-doping rule violation consistent with intentional use of prohibited substances specifically ingested to deliberately improve performance. The fact that the metabolites of two doping substances, which are “classical” doping substances, were found, supports this consideration. Therefore the IOC Disciplinary Commission decides on 22 November 2016 that the Athlete, Boyanka Kostova: 1.) is found to have committed an anti-doping rule violation pursuant to the IOC Anti-Doping Rules applicable to the Games of the XXX Olympiad in London in 2012, 2.) is disqualified from the Women’s 58 kg weightlifting event in which she participated upon the occasion of the Olympic Games London 2012, 3.) has the diploma obtained in the Women’s 58 kg weightlifting event withdrawn and is ordered to return the same. 4.) The IWF is requested to modify the results of the above-mentioned event accordingly and to consider any further action within its own competence. 5.) The National Olympic Committee of the Azerbaijani Republic shall ensure full implementation of this decision. 6.) The National Olympic Committee of the Azerbaijani Republic shall notably secure the return to the IOC, as soon as possible, of the diploma awarded in connection with the Women’s 58 kg weightlifting event to the Athlete. 7.) This decision enters into force immediately.

show » details »
Type:
pdf

IOC 2016 IOC vs Aksana Miankova (London Olympiad)

Related case: IOC 2016 IOC vs IOC 2016 IOC vs Aksana Miankova (Beijing Olympics) November 22, 2016 Ms. Aksana Miankova is a Belarussian Athlete competing in the Women’s hammer throw event at the London 2012 Olympic Games. Previously the Athlete also competed at the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games. In 2016, the IOC decided to perform further analyses on certain samples collected during the 2012 Olympic Games. These additional analyses were performed with analytical methods which were not available in 2012. In June 2016 the International Olympic Committee reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after her 2012 A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substances dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (turinabol) and stanozolol. After notification the Athlete submitted that she did not challenge the test results and she waived her right to be heard for the IOC Disciplinary Commission. The IOC was also informed that reanalysis of the Athlete’s samples provided at the Beijng 2008 Olympic Games tested positive for the prohibited substances dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (turinabol) and oxandrolone. The Commission finds that the Athlete did not challenge the test results and concludes that the Athlete has committed an anti-doping rule violation consistent with intentional use of prohibited substances specifically ingested to deliberately improve performance. The fact that the metabolites of two doping substances, which are “classical” doping substances, were found, supports this consideration. The Commission notes that the samples collected on the occasion of the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games were also found to contain two Prohibited Substances, dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (turinabol) and oxandrolone, more than suggests that the Athlete has been using doping on a regular basis throughout her career. She could evade detection until the new methods based on long-term metabolites finally exposed her. Therefore the IOC Disciplinary Commission decides on 22 November 2016 that the Athlete, Aksana Miankova: 1.) is found to have committed an anti-doping rule violation pursuant to the IOC Anti-Doping Rules applicable to the Games of the XXX Olympiad in London in 2012, 2.) is disqualified from the Women’s hammer throw event in which she participated upon the occasion of the Olympic Games London 2012, 3.) has the diploma obtained in the Women’s hammer throw event withdrawn and is ordered to return the same. 4.) The IAAF is requested to modify the results of the above-mentioned event accordingly and to consider any further action within its own competence. 5.) The National Olympic Committee of the Republic of Belarus shall ensure full implementation of this decision. 6.) The National Olympic Committee of the Republic of Belarus shall notably secure the return to the IOC, as soon as possible, of the diploma awarded in connection with the Women’s hammer throw event to the Athlete. 7.) This decision enters into force immediately.

show » details »
Type:
pdf

IOC 2016 IOC vs Ilya Ilin (London Olympiad)

Related case: IOC 2016 IOC vs Ilya Ilin (Beijng Olympiad) November 22, 2016 Mr. Ilya Ilin is a Kazakh Athlete competing in the Men’s 94 kg weightlifting event at the London 2012 Olympic Games. Previously the Athlete also competed at the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games. In 2016, the IOC decided to perform further analyses on certain samples collected during the 2012 Olympic Games. These additional analyses were performed with analytical methods which were not available in 2012. In June 2016 the International Olympic Committee reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his 2012 A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substances dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (turinabol) and stanozolol. After notification the IWF ordered a provisional suspension and the Athlete was excluded for the Rio 2016 Olympic Games. The Athlete submitted that he did not challenge the test results and he waived his right to be heard for the IOC Disciplinary Commission. The IOC was also informed that reanalysis of the Athlete’s samples provided at the Beijng 2008 Olympic Games tested positive for the prohibited substance stanozolol. The Commission finds that the Athlete did not challenge the test results and concludes that the Athlete has committed an anti-doping rule violation consistent with intentional use of prohibited substances specifically ingested to deliberately improve performance. The fact that the metabolite of two doping substances, which are “classical” doping substances, were found, supports this consideration. The Commission notes that the samples collected on the occasion of the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games were also found to contain a Prohibited Substance, stanozolol, which was also detected in the samples collected in 2012, more than suggests that the Athlete has been using doping on a regular basis throughout his career. He could evade detection until the new methods based on long-term metabolites finally exposed him. Therefore the IOC Disciplinary Commission decides on 22 November 2016 that the Athlete, Ilya Ilin: 1.) is found to have committed an anti-doping rule violation pursuant to the IOC Anti-Doping Rules applicable to the Games of the XXX Olympiad in London in 2012, 2.) is disqualified from the Men’s 94 kg weightlifting event in which he participated upon the occasion of the Olympic Games London 2012, 3.) has the medal, the medallist pin and the diploma obtained in the Men’s 94 kg weightlifting event withdrawn and is ordered to return the same. 4.) The IWF is requested to modify the results of the above-mentioned event accordingly and to consider any further action within its own competence. 5.) The National Olympic Committee of the Republic of Kazakhstan shall ensure full implementation of this decision. 6.) The National Olympic Committee of the Republic of Kazakhstan shall notably secure the return to the IOC, as soon as possible, of the medal, medallist pin and diploma awarded in connection with the Men’s 94 kg weightlifting event to the Athlete. 7.) This decision enters into force immediately.

show » details »
Type:
pdf
Category
  • (Medical) Science
  • Doping classes
  • Education
  • History
  • Laboratories
  • Legal
  • Statistics
Publication period
Origin
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Document category
  • Document type
  • Health/Medical
  • IF'S
  • Laboratories/Analysis
  • Legal Terms
  • Organisations
  • Substances
  • Various
  • Version