ITF 2018 ITF vs César Ramírez

Related case:
CAS 2019_A_6245 César Macnaught Ramírez Rodríguez vs ITF
January 23, 2020

In June 2018 the International Tennis Federation (ITF) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Mexican tennis player César Macnaught Ramírez Rodríguez after his A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substances 19-norandrosterone (Nandrolone), Boldenone, Drostanolone and Stanozolol.
After notification a provisional suspension was ordered. The Athlete filed a statement in his defence and he was heard for the ITF Independent Tribunal.

The Athlete gave a promt admission, accepted the test results and denied the intentional use of these substances. He explained that in the period before the competition in question he underwent surgery for his arm and had used the supplement Maxi Plus Suplexx recommended by the personal trainer Mr. Liro in order to help him to burn fat, have more energy and regenerate tissue. Also injections were administered by Mr. Liro which the Athlete understood were vitamins and Vampiro analgesics.

The Athlete asserted that Mr. Liro had confessed that he had substituted the ‘Vampiro’ injections for Deca Durabolin. Also Mr. Liro substituted the pills in the Athletes Maxi Plus Suplexx bottle for Stanozolol pills. Mr. Liro testified that he substituted the supplements and ‘vampiro’ injections with steroids in order to persude the Athlete to take him on as a personal trainer, and bolster his CV.

The Tribunal Panel is troubled about the inconsistencies in the evidence and statements and does not accept that it is more probable than not that Mr. Lira substituted four different steroids for Maxi Plus Suplexx and Vampire injections without the Athlete’s knowledge. Accordingly the Panel deems that the Athlete failed to establish that the violation was not intentional since he engaged in conduct which he knew constituted an anti-doping rule violation, or knew there was a significant risk that the conduct might constitute or result in an anti-doping rule violationand manifestly disregarded that risk.

Therefore the ITF Independent Tribunal decides on 18 March 2019 to impose a 4 year period on the Athlete starting on the date of the sample collection, i.e. 12 April 2018.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
Decisions International Federations
Date
18 March 2019
Arbitrator
Gallafent, Kate
Mackenzie, Isla
Murdock, Colin
Original Source
International Tennis Federation (ITF)
Country
Mexico
Language
English
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Legal Terms
Circumstantial evidence
Digital evidence / information
Prompt / Timely Admission
Sole Arbitrator
Sport/IFs
Tennis (ITF) - International Tennis Federation
Laboratories
Montreal, Canada: Laboratoire de controle du dopage INRS-Institut Armand-Frappier
Analytical aspects
B sample analysis
Substances
19-norandrosterone
Boldenone
Drostanolone
Nandrolone (19-nortestosterone)
Stanozolol
Medical terms
Legitimate Medical Treatment
Physical injury
Treatment / self-medication
Various
Athlete support personnel
Lying / false statement
Spiking / sabotage
Supplements
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
8 April 2019
Date of last modification
12 February 2020
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin