SAIDS 2020_10 SAIDS vs Thapelo Phora - Appeal

Related case:

SAIDS 2020_10 SAIDS vs Thapelo Phora
June 18, 2021

On 18 June 2021 the SAIDS Anti-Doping Hearing Panel decided to impose a reduced 8 month period of ineligibility on the Athlete Thapelo Phora after he tested positive for the prohibited substance Stanozolol.

Analysis of the Athlete's sealed and unsealed supplement containers in two accredited laboratories revealed contradictory results as in some batches contamination was detected, yet not in some other containers. As a result two experts of SAIDS reported that the posibility of contamination could not be excluded.

In first instance the Panel accepted that the Athlete's violation was not intentional and that he established on the balance of probabilities how the prohibited substance had entered his system.

Hereafter the South African Institute for Drug-Free Sport (SAIDS) appealed the Decision of 18 June 2021 with the Anti-Doping Appeal Board of South Africa. SAIDS requested the Appeal Panel to set aside the Appealed Decision and to impose a more severe sanction on the Athlete.

SAIDS contended that contamination of the Athlete's supplement was not proven on a balance of probabilities. It disputed the credibility of the Athlete and his witness statements and contended that he acted without utmost caution. 

Further SAIDS contended that in first instance the conclusions reached by the two experts and the Tribunal were erroneous regarding proving the source of the prohibited substance and the imposed sanction.

Considering the circumstances and evidence in this case the Appeal Panel concludes that the Athlete has established on a balance of probabilities that the contaminated supplement he used was the source of Stanozolol in his samples. Also there are no grounds to dismiss the Athlete's testimony as having been false, because after it was supported by objective facts.

Finally the Appeal Panel deems that the Athlete bears No Significant Fault or negligence, that his objective degree of fault is still to be light and that the imposed sanction is appropriate.

Therefore the Anti-Doping Appeal Board decides on 1 July 2021 to dismiss SAIDS' Appeal, to uphold the Appealed Decision of 18 June 2021 and to confirm the imposed sanction of 8 months.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
1 July 2021
Arbitrator
Diale, Mami
Nematswerani, Ephraim
Stelzner, Robert G.L.
Original Source
South African Institute for Drug-Free Sport (SAIDS)
Country
South Africa
Language
English
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Legal Terms
Admission
Burdens and standards of proof
Circumstantial evidence
No intention to enhance performance
No Significant Fault or Negligence
Period of ineligibility
Provisional suspension
Sport/IFs
Athletics (WA) - World Athletics
Other organisations
South African Institute for Drugfree Sport (SAIDS)
Laboratories
Bloemfontein, South Africa: South African Doping Control Laboratory
Analytical aspects
B sample analysis
Doping classes
S1. Anabolic Agents
Substances
Stanozolol
Various
Contamination
Supplements
Tip-off / whistleblower
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
9 September 2021
Date of last modification
27 September 2021
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin