FIFA 2019 FIFA vs Gastón Laduche Gerpe

On 24 October 2019 the South American Football Confederation (CONMEBOL) Disciplinary Court decided to sanction the Uruguayan football player Gastón Laduche Gerpe after he tested positive for the prohibited substance Dorzolamide. Imposed was a 6 month period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the sample collection, i.e. 28 April 2019.

Hereafter in December 2019 the International Football Federation (FIFA) reported a new anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his A and B samples - collected on 21 November 2019 - tested again positive for the substance Dorzolamide in a low concentration.

After notification a provisional suspension was ordered. The Athlete filed a statement in his defence and he was heard for the FIFA Disciplinary Committee.

The Athlete denied the intentional use of the substance and argued that he acted without Fault or Negligence. He asserted with corroborating evidence that in this case the positive test results were caused by intoxacation. This resulted in his first anti-doping rule violation for which he was already sanctioned for 6 months by CONMEBOL.

In support the Athlete filed an AMIDEVA Laboratory Report that stated that the source of the positive test result were prescribed eye drops containing Dorzolamide, used by his grandparents for the treatment of ocular glaucoma.

Through environmental and involutary contamination at his home the substance came into his system whereas it has the characteristics to remain in blood and urine for months. To avoid further evironmental contamination in the house of his grantparents the Athlete had moved to another house.

In view of the Athlete's AMIDEVA Report the FIFA's expert witness established that the found contration Dorzolamide in the Athlete's samples was 100 times lower than the Required Minimum Performance Levels defined in WADA Technical Document. The expert witness also confirmed that the source of origin had caused the positive tests in April 2019 as in November 2019 throug environmental contamination.

The FIFA Disciplinary Committee finds that the presence of a prohibited substance has been established in the Athlete's samples and accordingly that he committed an anti-doping rule violation.

Considering the evidence in this case the Committee accepts that the violation was not intentional and that the Athlete demonstrated how the substance had entered his system. As a result the Committee deems that there are exceptional circumstances and that the Athlete acted with No Fault or Negligence.

Therefore on 28 October 2021 the FIFA Disciplinary Committee decides not to impose disciplinary consequences on the Athlete.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
Decisions International Federations
Date
28 October 2021
Arbitrator
Akpovi, Guy
Hollerer, Thomas
Palacio, Jorge Ivan
Original Source
International Football Federation (FIFA)
Country
Uruguay
Language
Spanish
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Legal Terms
Burdens and standards of proof
Circumstantial evidence
Exceptional circumstances
Ne bis in idem
No Fault or Negligence
No intention to enhance performance
WADA Code, Guidelines, Protocols, Rules & Regulations
Sport/IFs
Football (FIFA) - International Football Federation
Laboratories
Los Angeles, USA: UCLA Olympic Analytical Laboratory
Analytical aspects
B sample analysis
Half-life / excretion time of substance
Threshold for exogenous substances
Doping classes
S5. Diuretics and Other Masking Agents
Substances
Dorzolamide
Medical terms
Legitimate Medical Treatment
Various
Contamination
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
31 August 2022
Date of last modification
10 November 2022
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin