TJD-AD 2022-009 Appeal Decision - Cycling

Related case:

TJD-AD 2022-008 Disciplinary Decision - Cycling
June 14, 2022

On 14 June 2022 the Brazilian Sports Justice Anti-Doping Tribunal (TJD-AD) decides to impose a 4 year period of ineligibility on the cyclist after he tested positive for the prohibited substance Enobosarm (ostarine).

In first instance the Rapporteur concluded that the Athlete failed to demonstate that the violation was not intentional because of a contaminated supplement. He also deemed that there were several inconsistencies his statements.

Hereafter in July 2022 the Athlete appealed the disciplinary decision with the TJD-AD Appeal Panel. He requested the Appeal Panel to set aside the Appealed Decision and to impose a reduced sanction.

The Athlete denied the intentional use of the substance and argued that he acted as a recreational cyclist. He acknowledged that he had failed to mention all his supplements on the Doping Control Form.

He alleged that he had demonstrated sufficiently with circumstantial evidence and analysis in the Rio Lab that a commercial supplement was contaminated. He asserted that a low concentration of Ostarine was found in this over-the-counter supplement, consistent with the low concentration Ostarine found in his sample.

Following assessment of the evidence the Appeal Panel accepts that the Athlete can be qualified as a recreational cyclist. Although the Athlete had provided two open unsealed supplement for analysis to the Rio Lab this fault can not invalidate the test result that showed that one supplement was contaminated.

Further the Panel considers that scientific studies showed that 15 procent of the industrial supplements can contain contaminants. The Athlete was tested before without issues and the concentration found in his system was very low and consistent with the concentration contaminants present in his supplement.

Therefore the TJD-AD Appeal Panel decides on 9 September 2022 to set aside the Appealed Decision and to impose a reduced 6 month period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 10 August 2021.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
9 September 2022
Arbitrator
Albuquerque e Souza, João Antonio
Baptista, Marta Wada
Barbosa, Daniel Chieriguini
Ferreira, Alexandre
Miranda, Martinho Neves
Nicolau, Jean Eduardo Batista
Nunes, Tatiana Mesquita
Rocha, Selma Fátima Melo
Original Source
Brazilian Sports Justice Anti-Doping Tribunal (TJD-AD)
Country
Brazil
Language
Portuguese
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Legal Terms
Burdens and standards of proof
Circumstantial evidence
No intention to enhance performance
No Significant Fault or Negligence
Period of ineligibility
Sport/IFs
Cycling (UCI) - International Cycling Union
Other organisations
Autoridade Brasileira de Controle de Dopagem (ABCD) - Brazilian Doping Control Authority
Tribunal de Justiça Desportiva Antidopagem (TJD-AD) - Brazilian Sports Justice Anti-Doping Tribunal
Laboratories
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Laboratório Brasileiro de Controle de Dopagem – LBCD – LADETEC / IQ - UFRJ
Doping classes
S1. Anabolic Agents
Substances
Selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs)
Various
Amateur / club / recreational sport
Contamination
Supplements
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
4 January 2023
Date of last modification
10 February 2023
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin