Facts
The French Triathlon Federation (Fédération Française de Triathlon, FFTri) charges respondent M82 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a triathlon on April 18, 2010, a sample was taken for doping control purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisolone and prednisone. These are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and are regarded as specified substances.

History
The respondent used medication which contained the prohibited substances to treat swollen lips and throat. He has a medical prescription for this and reports of pneumology and allergy testing.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision (six months period of ineligibility) of August 24, 2010, of the disciplinary committee of the FFTri will be modified.
3. The present decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M81 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on March 20, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of a metabolite of nandrolone. Nandrolone is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't provide any explanation about how the prohibited substance had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized or authorized by French sport federations.
2. All the results obtained at March 20, 2010, will be cancelled. Medals, points and prizes will be withdrawn.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M80 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on March 28, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of nandrolone. Nandrolone is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent didn't provide any explanation about how the prohibited substance had entered his body. The concentration of the prohibited substance measured was very high.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three years in which the respondent can't take part of competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFC, as pronounced by the decision dated July 13, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFC, but extended to all relevant French sport federations.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M79 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on March 6, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of a metabolite of Cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't provide any explanation about how the prohibited substance had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized or authorized by the FFHMFAC.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period served by the decision (two months period of ineligibility), dated May 18, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFHMFAC.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M78 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on March 6, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent uses cannabis occasionally in a recreational setting. There was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of four months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized or authorized by the FFHMFAC.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period served by the decision (one month period of ineligibility), dated May 18, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFHMFAC.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Football Federation (Fédération Française de Football Américain, FFFA) charges respondent M77 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on November 22, 2009, a sample was taken for doping control purposes. The analysis showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substance had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFFA.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation for Public Physical Education (Union Française des Oeuvres Laïques d'Éducation Physique, UFOLEP) charges respondent M72 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on June 6, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisolone and prednisone. These substances are prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and regarded as specified substances.

History
Respondent had used medication containing prednisolone to treat nasopharyngitis. He has a certificate from his physician and a certificate of his practitioner to state his medical condition. However these statements don't explain the concentration measured.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized or authorized by the UFOLEP, as pronounced by the disciplinary committee of the UFOLEP on August 23, 2010, but extended to all relevant French sport federations.
2. The decision start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Rugby League (Fédération Française de Rugby à XIII, FFR XIII) charges respondent M75 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. Respondent didn't provide his whereabouts data correctly as being part of the registered testing group.

History
The respondent explains that his misconduct derived from some work related problems, for that reason he wasn't engaged with his sport.

Decision
1. The sanction: a period of ineligibility of six months, as pronounced in the decision, dated July 7, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFR XIII, is upheld.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served by the decision of July 7, 2010.
3. The appeal of the respondent is rejected.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

In October 2011 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Ionut Cristian Enciu after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance metandienone, fluoxymesterone and methyltestosterone.
After notification the Athlete did not attend the hearing of the ANAD Hearing Commission, nor did he file a statement in his defence.
Therefore the ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of decision.

In October 2011 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Raul Lenart after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance oxymesterone.
After notification the Athlete filed a statement in his defence and did not attend the hearing of the ANAD Hearing Commission.
The Athlete admitted the use of the prohibited substance and did not request the B sample analysis.
Therefore the ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of decision.