In September 2010 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Ioan Cristian Costescu after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance methylhexaneamine (dimethylpentylamine).
The Athlete stated he suffered from acne vulgaris and therefore used the medication oxsorale, prescribed by his doctor. The leaflet of this medication did not mention the prohibited substance found in the Athlete’s sample.

The ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete.

Related case:
FIBA 2011 FIBA vs Yamene Jave Coleman
February 9, 2011

In September 2010 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Player Yamene Jave Coleman after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance hydrochlorothiazide.
The Player filed a statement with evidence in his defence and was heard for the ANAD Hearing Commission. The Player stated he used medication for hypertension. He submitted medical documentation from doctors in Romania and the USA in support of his statement and submitted a request for a retroactive TUE for hydrochlorothiazide.
On 27 October 2010 the ANAD Hearing Commission decided, based on the “retroactive TUE granted” and the Player’s medical condition, to eliminate the provisional suspension and to sanction the Player with a reprimand.

Hereafter the Player was notified by FIBA in February 2011 and heard for the FIBA Disciplinary Panel.

In September 2010 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Agoston Jozsef Moldovan after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substances stanozolol and clenbuterol.
At the hearing the Athlete admitted the use of the prohibited substances and did not request for the B sample analysis.
On 12 October 2010 the ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.

Related case:
ANAD Comisia de Apel 2012_01 Domokos Balogh vs ANAD
November 18, 2010

In June 2010 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Domokos Balogh after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance testosterone with a T/E ratio above the WADA threshold.
After notification a provisional suspension was ordered.
Research of the Athlete’s supplements showed that the food supplement Animal Test contained the prohibited substance testosterone.
On 16 September 2010 the ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. 12 August 2010.

Related case:

ANAD Comisia de Apel 2010_09 WADA vs Miruna Elena Trifan
December 9, 2010

In June 2010 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the minor Athlete Miruna Elena Trifan after her sample tested positive for the prohibited substance metandienone.
The Athlete stated she had used pills provided by her coach Xenofonte Boboc. The coach admitted he gave the Athlete Naposim (metandienone) without the medical staff’s notice and without knowledge of the Athlete or members of her family.

Due to the coach guilt and the Athlete’s no fault, the ANAD Hearing Commission decides not to sanction the Athlete on 12 August 2010.
The ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose lifetime period of ineligibility on the coach Xenofonte Boboc, starting on the date of the decision.

Hereafter in September 2010 WADA appealed the decision of the ANAD Hearing Commission with the ANAD Appeal Commission due to the Athlete’s no fault.

In June 2010 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Darius Constantin Dumitriu after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance testosterone with a T/E ratio above the WADA threshold.
After notification the Athlete was heard for the ANAD Hearing Commission.
The Athlete denied the use of testosterone and did not request for the B sample analysis.
On 12 August 2010 the ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.

In July 2010 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Vlad Alexandru Ionaşcu after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance cannabis as a second violation.
The Athlete admitted the use of cannabis before he signed the doping control form and initially refused to provide a sample due to he knew he had committed a second anti-doping rule violation, but finally provided the sample.
After notification the Athlete failed to attend the hearing of the ANAD Hearing Commission.
Considering this is the Athlete’s second anti-doping rule violation the ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 1 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.

In July 2010 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Paul Cӑtrunӑ after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance 19-norandrosterone (nandrolone).
After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete was heard for the ANAD Hearing Commission.

The Athlete argued that he suffered from an injury in June 2009 and therefore used Decanofort (nandrolone) causing the positive doping test in July 2010. However this argument was dismissed after consultancy of the Cologne Doping Laboratory and the review of studies or researches in the field.
Therefore the ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 8 July 2010.

In July 2010 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Denis Adrian Blidariu after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance metenolone.
After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete filed a statement in his defence.
The Athlete admitted the use of metenolone and did not request for the B sample analysis.
Therefore the ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 8 July 2010.

In July 2010 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Adrian Rusu after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance stanozolol.
After notification the Athlete failed to attend the hearing of the ANAD Hearing Commission, nor did he file a statement in his defence.
Therefore the ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.