Facts
The French Ski Federation (Fédération Française de Ski, FFS) charges respondent M62 with a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a ski event on March 25, 2006, the respondent didn't attend the doping control.

History
The respondent denies to be informed about having a doping control. He had left the competition earlier because of stomach problems. He has proof of visiting a physician and a declaration for leaving the competition.

Decision
1. The earlier decision (an acquittal) dated June 26, 2006, of the disciplinary committee of the FFS will not be modified.
2. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Ice Sports (Fédération Française des Sports de Glace, FFSG) charges respondent M61 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on October 29, 2005, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of ephedrine. Ephedrine is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The disciplinary committee had sanctioned the respondent with a period of ineligibility of six months from which four months conditionally.
Respondent had used medication without mentioning it on the doping control form. Also he didn't explain the reason for his positive test. Because of the fact that the appeal of the respondent wasn't handled within the time limit the sanctions are restricted only to the French federation of ice hockey.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months, from which three months conditionally, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the French Ice Hockey Federation (FFHG).
2. The decision will start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation for Judo, Jujitsu, Kendo and Associated Disciplines (Fédération Française de Judo, Jujitsu, Kendo et Disciplines Associées FFJDA) charges respondent M60 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a judo tournament on May 14, 2005, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of furosemide, 19-norandrosterone, 19-noretiocholanolone and testerone. These are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent didn't object against the findings. Also he didn't sent in written statements and didn't attend the hearing.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three years in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFJDA.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
2. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Roller Skating Federation (Fédération Française de Roller Skating, FFRS) charges respondent M59 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on January 7, 2006, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent didn't object against the findings, also he didn't sent written statements and didn't attend the hearing.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months, from which one month conditionally, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFRS.
2. The present decision will start on the day of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Wrestling Federation (Fédération Française de Lutte, FFL) charges respondent M58 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. After a match on November 19, 2005, respondent failed to attend the requested doping control.

History
Respondent had a knee injury during the match and went to the hospital without attending the doping control. At the hearing he explained that he was not able to master his deception after his injury, for which he couldn't combat for several weeks.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility lasting eighteen months, with nine months conditionally, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorize by the FFL.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Volley-ball (Fédération Française de Volley-ball, FFVB) charges respondent M57 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a Volleyball match on December 10, 2005, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent had received a warning by the disciplinary committee of the FFVB. Considering that respondent does not dispute the results of the analyses he appeared before the disciplinary body federal, he was surprised by the results of the analyses, claiming never to have smoked cannabis; he explains the presence of this substance in urine from passive smoking during a party at the eve before the doping control.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months, from which two conditionally, in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFVB.
2. The decision starts on the date of the notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M56 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on December 17, 2005, respondent didn't supply a sample for doping control.

History
The respondent did attend the doping control but was summoned to go to his job and didn't undergo his doping control. To prove his good faith he used a private laboratory and this analysis showed the presence of testosterone, cortisol, caffeine and ephedrine.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years, during this period respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFHMFAC.
2. The decision start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Ice Sports (Fédération Française de Sports de Glace, FFSG) charges respondent M55 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on October 29, 2005, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of metabolites of metandienone. Metandienone is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substances had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the French Ice Hockey Federation (FFHG).
2. The decision will start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Motorcycling Federation (Fédération Française de motocyclisme, FFM) charges respondent M54 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a motorcycling event on Juni 3, 2006, respondent was unable to complete the doping control.

History
The respondent failed to produce enough urine for a valid sample, and a complementary sample was not produced.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFM.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of American Football (Fédération Française de Football Américain, FFFA) charges respondent M53 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on March 25, 2006, respondent didn't attend the doping control.

History
The respondent wanted to shower first before the doping control, there were showers at the doping control station. His request to use another facility was denied. Despite explaining the consequences the respondent left the scene. The sports director of the team had written a complaint about the late hour of the doping control.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the French sport federations.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.