AFLD 2014 UFOLEP vs Respondent M15

12 Mar 2014

Facts
The French Federation for Public Physical Education (Union Française des Oeuvres Laïques d'Éducation Physique, UFOLEP) charges respondent M15 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an athletics event on October 20, 2013, respondent didn't attend the doping control.

History
Respondent refused to wait after she was summoned to attend a doping control. The sampler was handling another doping control before it was her turn. Respondent claims not to have deliberated evaded the doping control.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized or authorized by UFOLEP and related federations.
2. The decision start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2014 FFA vs Respondent M14

12 Mar 2014

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M14 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an athletic event on March 3, 2013, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisolone and prednisone which are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substances had entered her body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of one year in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFA and related federations.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served: in voluntary suspension, by the decision dated June 10, 2013, of the Kenya Athletics Federation and by the decision of the medical/anti-doping committee of the Kenya Athletics Federation.
3. All the results obtained at March 3, 2013, will be cancelled. Medals, points and prizes will be withdrawn.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2014 FFA vs Respondent M12

19 Feb 2014

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M12 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an athletic event on August 24, 2013, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cocaine. Cocaine is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent denies the use of cocaine, but had used tea made from coca leaves five hours before the event started. There was no intention to enhance sport performance.
The panel considers the concentration measured in accordance with the consumption of tea from coca leaves as a process of metabolization.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2014 FFC vs Respondent M11

19 Feb 2014

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M11 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on September 1, 2013, respondent provided a sample for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of salmeterol which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. It is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent used medication containing salmeterol, he did mention the use on the doping control form. He uses two puffs a day to treat chronic rhinitis and asthma. He has a certificate from his physician, a pulmonary examination and blood tests to prove his condition.
The panel regards the documents and the concentration measured as medical justifiable for the use of the medication.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2014 FFEchecs vs Respondent M09

19 Feb 2014

FACTS
The French Chess Federation (Fédération Française des Échecs, FFEchecs) charges respondent M09 for a violation of the Anti-Doping rules. During a match on June 29, 2013, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of hydrochlorothiazide and another thiazide. These substances are prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and regarded as specified substances.

History
Respondent had used medications containing the prohibited substances to treat high blood pressure. He had mentioned the use on the doping control form, also he has the results of two electrocardiograms and a certificate of his cardiologist as proof of his condition.
The panel regards the concentration measured as medical justifiable for treatment.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision will by published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2014 FFSCDA vs Respondent M08

23 Jan 2014

Facts
The French federation of Full Contact and associated sports (Fédération Française de Sports de Contact et Disciplines Associées, FFSCDA) charges respondent M08 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on May 17, 2013, respondent was unable to produce enough urine for his doping test.

History
The respondent failed his doping control and had left the doping control area he returned with a plastic cup with his urine. This wasn't accepted by the sampler because the sample must be provided under his supervision. Respondent didn't provide any explanation for his behavior.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFSCDA and associated federations.
2. All the individual results obtained on May 17, 2013, are cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2014 FFC vs Respondent M07

23 Jan 2014

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M07 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on June 2, 2013, respondent provided a sample for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent denies the use of erythropoietin consequently his B-sample will be tested. Despite his denial he didn't deliver any explanation how the prohibited substance had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by French sport federations.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served in: voluntary suspension, or by the decision of the disciplinary committee of the FFC.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2014 FFM vs Respondent M06

23 Jan 2014

Facts
The French Federation of Powerboat Racing (Fédération Française de Motonautique, FFM) charges Respondent M06 with a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an event on June 2, 2013, de respondent provided a sample for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of morphine which is a prohibited substance on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. It is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent used medication containing codeine to treat opthalmic migraines. Codeine metabolizes into morphine which causes the positive test. Respondent did request for a therapeutic use exemption (TUE). The measured concentrations of codeine and morphine are consistent with the medical use.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2014 FFBad vs Respondent M05

23 Jan 2014

Facts
The French Badminton Federation (Fédération Française de Badminton, FFBad) charges respondent M05 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an event on May 19, 2013, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisolone and prednisone. These substances are prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and regarded as specified substances.

History
The respondent used medication containing prednisolone which metabolizes into prednisolone to treat a pain in the knee. This was mentioned on the doping control form. He has a prescription and
two certificats from his physician.
The panel regards the measured concentrations consistent with the medical use of the prohibited substances.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2014 FFHMFAC vs Respondent M04

23 Jan 2014

Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M04 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on October 5, 2013, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of metenolone and its metabolite, a metabolite of drostanolone, clenbuterol, a metabolite of tamoxifen, and canrenone which are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent didn't gave any information about how the prohibited substances had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of four years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by French sport federations.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin