ANAD Comisia de Audiere 2013_21 ANAD vs Ioan Cojocari-Taut

2 Dec 2013

In October 2013 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Ioan Cojocari-Taut after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance metenolone.
After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete was heard for the ANAD Hearing Commission.
The Athlete admitted he used tablets, recommended by a an acquaintance, but he stopped using these tablets due to he did not feel well after administration.
The ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. 18 November 2013.

ANAD Comisia de Audiere 2013_19 ANAD vs Alexandru Draghici

18 Nov 2013

In October 2013 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Alexandru Draghici after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance methylhexaneamine (dimethylpentylamine).

At the hearing the Athlete stated he used a supplement Neurocore, recommended by a friend and purchased on the internet. The label of the product mentioned the ingredient Geranium Extract but not the substance methylhexaneamine. Also the Athlete argued that he practices recreational sport only.

The Commission considered that the Athlete had no intention to enhance sport performance and that the synonym Geranium for methylhexaneamine is not mentioned in the Prohibited List or on the WADA website.
Therefore the ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 3 month period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.

ANAD Comisia de Audiere 2013_18 ANAD vs Augustin Barbu

15 Oct 2013

Related case:
ANAD Comisia de Audiere 2013_07 ANAD vs Roxana Elisabeta Birca
October 15, 2013

The Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Coach Augustin Barbu for complicity due to the anti-doping rule violations committed by two Athletes he trained.

The sample of the Athlete Maxim Simona Raula tested positive for the prohibited substance erythropoietin (EPO) and she left the trainingcamp prior to a doping control with the coach his approval.
Hereafter the Coach gave inconclusive and contradictory statements about the Athlete’s absence. Considering the circumstances the ANAD Hearing Commission imposed a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete Maxim Simona Raula.
Due to the sample of the second Athlete Roxana Elisabeta Birca tested positive for the prohibited substance methastrone, the ANAD Hearing Commission imposed a 2 year period of ineligibility.

Considering there is no acceptable evidence the ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose no ineligibility on the coach Augustin Barbu.

ANAD Comisia de Audiere 2013_17 ANAD vs Roxana Elisabeta Birca

15 Oct 2013

Related case:
ANAD Comisia de Audiere 2013_18 ANAD vs Augustin Barbu
October 15, 2013

In July 2013 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Roxana Elisabeta Birca after her A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substances methasterone.
After notification a provisional suspension was ordered the Athlete was heard for the ANAD Hearing Commission.
The Athlete and her coach stated they could not explain the presence of the prohibited substance in her sample.
The ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 5 September 2013.

ANAD Comisia de Audiere 2013_16 ANAD vs Josef Gabor

8 Oct 2013

In September 2013 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Josef Gabor after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substances amiloride, hydrochlorothiazide and testosterone with a T/E ratio above the WADA threshold.
After notification the Athlete filed a statement in his defence and did not attend the hearing of the ANAD Hearing Commission.
The Athlete admitted the use of the prohibited substances and did not request the B sample analysis.
The ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.

ANAD Comisia de Audiere 2013_15 ANAD vs Paul Rîteam

8 Oct 2013

In September 2013 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Paul Rîteam after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substances methandienone and stanozolol.
At the hearing the Athlete admitted the use of the prohibited substance and did not request the B sample analysis.
The ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.

ANAD Comisia de Audiere 2013_09 ANAD vs Paul Nicolae Catruna

8 Jul 2013

In June 2013 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Paul Nicolae Catruna after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance clenbuterol.
After notification the Athlete failed to respond nor did het attend the hearing of the ANAD Hearing Commission.
Due to this is the Athlete’s second violation the ANAD Hearing commission decides to impose a lifetime period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.

ANAD Comisia de Audiere 2013_08 ANAD vs Tudor Alexandru Dobre

11 Jun 2013

In May 2013 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Tudor Alexandru Dobre after his sample tested positive for a high concentration of the prohibited substance cannabis.
At the hearing the Athlete admitted he use of cannabis at a party and did not request the B sample analysis.

The ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 6 month period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.

ANAD Comisia de Audiere 2013_07 ANAD vs Andrei Blindu

4 Jun 2013

In April 2013 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Andrei Blindu after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance 19-norandrosterone, metabolite of nandrolone.

At the hearing the Athlete could not explain the positive test result. The only suspicious supplement was Nitrix, purchased on the internet, but laboratory analysis hereafter showed it contained no prohibited substance.
The ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.

ANAD Comisia de Audiere 2013_06 ANAD vs Robert Kim

4 Jun 2013

The Athlete Robert Kim admitted voluntarily to ANAD the use of anabolic steroids as instructed, provided and administered by his coach Ms. Monica Muresan and her husband Mr. Mircea Muresan in order to enhance his performance. The Athlete’s statement was sustained by his college Athlete Andrei Cseterki, who also received these doping substances.
Both athletes agreed to provide a sample in support of their statements.
Hereafter the sample of Robert Kim tested positive for the prohibited substance boldenone.
The sample of the athlete Andrei Cseterki tested positive for the prohibited substances methandienone, 19-norandrosterone, cannabis and testosterone with a T/E ratio above the WADA threshold.

The ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 1 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date the decision.

Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin