In November 2010 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Andreea Moldovan after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance sibutramine.
After notification the Athlete filed a statement in her defence and did not attend the hearing of the ANAD Hearing Commission.
The Athlete submitted that she was under treatment with a product to loose weight, whick was declared on the Doping Control Form. The Athlete retired from sport and did not request the for the B sample analysis.
The ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 3 month period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.

In December 2010 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Andrei Florescu after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substances metelonone and stanozolol.

The Athlete admitted the use of the prohibited substances and did not request for the B sample analysis.
The ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.

Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M74 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on December 19, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of salbutamol. Salbutamol is a prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent uses a spray to deal with his asthma, he takes this daily and also before and during intense physical exertion. There is no intention to enhance sport performance. He has medical proof of his condition.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision, dated April 13, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFHMFAC will not be modified.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Basketball Federation (Fédération Française de Basket-Ball, FFBB) charges respondent M73 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on April 10, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisone and prednisolone. Prednisone and prednisolone are prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and they are regarded as specified substances.

History
The respondent had used medication which contained the prohibited substances to treat his wisdom teeth a week before the doping control. He had a copy of the order for surgery and a pharmaceutical prescription which shows the prohibited substance. The panel doesn't recognize the produced documents as therapeutic justification for the medication, also the use wasn't mentioned during the doping control.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFBB.
2. The decision dated June 22, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFBB should be cancelled.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation for Public Physical Education (Union Française des Oeuvres Laïques d'Éducation Physique, UFOLEP) charges respondent M72 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on May 9, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of triamcinolone. This substance is prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
Respondent admits an intramuscular injection with the prohibited substance without a therapeutic justification.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of one year, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized or authorized by the UFOLEP, as decided by the disciplinary committee of the UFOLEP on July 10, 2010, but extended to all relevant French sport federations.
2. The decision start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French federation of Full Contact and associated sports (Fédération Française de Sports de Contact et Disciplines Associées, FFSCDA) charges respondent M71 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a full contact match on March 26, 2009, the athlete didn't provide a sample for doping control

History
The respondent was unable to provide a sample and didn't return for a second time.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of one year in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFSCDA.
2. The decision, dated December 23, 2009, of the disciplinary committee of the FFSCDA should be modified.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Rugby Federation (Fédération Française de Rugby, FFR) charges respondent M70 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on February 21, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used the prohibited substance during a festivity for the birth of his child, a few days before the doping test, he had mentioned the use on the filling form of the doping control.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFR.
2. The decision (warning) of April 29, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFR should be modified.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Rugby Federation (Fédération Française de Rugby, FFR) charges respondent M69 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on February 28, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substance had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFR.
2. The period of ineligibility should be reduced by the period already served by the decision (three months period of ineligibility) of May 17, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFR.
3. The decision, dated May 17, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFR should be modified.
4. The decision will start on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M68 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on March 27, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of ephedrine, prednisolone and prednisone, clenbutorol and a metabolite of nandrolone. For the metabolite of nandrolone a high amount was measured, a complementary isotope-ratio mass spectrometry report showed that the metabolite of nandrolone had an exogenous origin. All these substances are prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The Respondent had obtained product from the internet which contained the prohibited substances. He used it to treat mononucleosis infectiosa [also called: glandular fever, Pfeiffer's disease, Filatov's disease or kissing decease] and secondly to keep pace with the cycling events of the first category.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of four years in which the respondent can't take part of competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFC, as pronounced by the decision dated July 13, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFC, but extended to all relevant French sport federations.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation for Judo, Jujitsu, Kendo and Associated Disciplines (Fédération Française de Judo, Jujitsu, Kendo et Disciplines Associées FFJDA) charges respondent M67 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a tournament, on December 12, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of Salbutamol. Salbutamol is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. It is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent did not contest the result of the tests. The reason for the positive test was medication he used to treat asthma. The use of the medication was mentioned on the filling form during the doping test and he holds two medical certificates to confirm his condition.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months
2. The decision (acquittal) of February 18, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFJDA should be modified.
3. The present decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.