Facts
The French Rugby Federation (Fédération Française de Rugby, FFR) charges respondent M66 or a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on March 6, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substance had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFR.
2. The period of ineligibility should be reduced by the period already served by the decision (three months period of ineligibility) of June 9, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFR.
3. The decision, dated June 9, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFR should be modified.
4. The decision will start on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Rugby Federation (Fédération Française de Rugby, FFR) charges respondent M65 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on January 31, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substance had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFR.
2. The period of ineligibility should be reduced by the period already served by the decision (three months period of ineligibility) of April 29, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFR.
3. The decision, dated April 29, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFR should be modified.
4. The decision will start on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M59 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on February 6, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't provide any explanation about how the prohibited substances had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a six months period of ineligibility in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFHMFAC.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already server under the decision (3 months period of ineligibility), dated April 13, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFHMFAC.
3. The decision, dated April 13, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFHMFAC should be modified.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Workers and Amateurs in sports (Fédération Sportive et Gymnique du Travail (FSGT)) charges respondent M58 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling contest on January 31, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis showed the presence of prednisone and prednisolone. Prednisone and prednisolone are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and are regarded as specified substances.

History
The respondent used medication for asthmatic bronchitis, this medication was the cause for the positive test. There is medical proof for his condition. However there is no statement of his physician and the concentrations measured are to high for medical reasons. The alleged therapeutic justification can not be accepted. Also not giving the name of the medication he used shows negligence.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of nine months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by French sport federations.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the time already served under the decision (3 months of ineligibility), dated May 4, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FSGT.
3. The present decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Swimming Federation (Fédération Française de Natation, FFN) charges respondent M57 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a water polo match on January 16, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisone, prednisolone and a metabolite of cannabis. These substances are prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and are regarded as a specified substancea.

History
The respondent used medication to treat a pain in his shoulder, he has a medical certificate for this. The cause for the positive test for a metabolite for cannabis is passive smoking during parties from friends who use this prohibited substance. The proof for the shoulder injury and treatment is valid, but the amount of the metabolites of cannabis is inconsistent with passive smoking.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized or authorized by the FFN.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served by the decision (3 months period of ineligibility), dated April 9, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFN.
3. The decision, dated April 9, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFN should be modified.
4. The decision start on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M56 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on August 27, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence heptaminol. Heptaminol is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The Respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substances had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of one year in which the respondent can't take part of competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFC, as pronounced by the decision dated March 3, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFC, but extended to all relevant French sport federations.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Boxing Federation (Fédération Française de Boxe, FFBoxe) - charges respondent M55 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on December 19, 2009, a sample for a doping test purposes was taken. The sample tested positive on a metabolite of Cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list, it is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used the prohibited substance in a private setting do deal with some personal problems she faced. There was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFBoxe.
2.. The period of ineligibility should be reduced by the period already served by the decision (3 months period of ineligibility), dated March 30, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFBoxe.
4. The decision, dated March 30, 2010, by the appeal committee of the FFBoxe should be modified.
5. The decision starts on the date of notification.
6. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Ski Federation (Fédération Française de Ski, FFS) charges respondent M54 with a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a ski event on February 13, 2010, the respondent provided a sample for doping test purposes. His sample showed the presence of prednisolone and prednisone. Prednisolone and prednisone are prohibited substances on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. They are regarded as specified substances.

History
The respondent used medication which contained the prohibited substances to treat a "sore throat" caused by the syndrome of Fernand Widal. However, the use of the medication was without prior consultation with a health professional. Furthermore, the medical documentation provided by the athlete on a long duration affection for an asthmatic condition from which he suffers, is not directly related to the symptoms which he says have suffered. The justification for therapeutic alleged by the latter can not be accepted.

Decision
1. The sanction is a one month period of ineligibility in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFS.
2. The decision (a warning), dated May 21, 2010, of the disciplinary committee of the FFS should be modified.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Basketball Federation (Fédération Française de Basket-Ball, FFBB) charges respondent M53 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on January 23, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent uses the prohibited substance occasionally in a recreational setting, there was no intention to enhance sport performance especially because he practice the sport on a modest level and plays it for his pleasure.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of four months, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFBB.
2. The decision (two months period of ineligibility), dated April 7, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFBB should be cancelled.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Rugby Federation (Fédération Française de Rugby, FFR) charges respondent M52 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on February 21, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substance had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFR.
2. The period of ineligibility should be reduced by the period already served in voluntary suspension and by the decision (three months period of ineligibility) of April 29, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFR.
3. The decision, dated April 29, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFR should be modified.
4. The decision will start on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.