The Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the AthleteBrice Kabengele-Kalala after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance cannabis.
The Athlete admitted he used cannabis and did not request for the B sample analysis.
The ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 6 month period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the decision.

Mr. Virgil Nicolae Iordache is the team physiokinetotherapist of the Romanian Asesoft Ploiesti University Sport Club. In May 2010 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against Mr. Iordache after he prescribed the product Ginko Fort, which contained the prohibited substance heptaminol, to the Athlete Cӑtӑlin Burlacu as medical treatment.
Due to the treatment, the Athlete’s sample hereafter tested positive for the prohibited substance heptaminol. Considering the Athlete’s lack of guilt the ANAD Hearing Commission decided to impose a 3 month period of ineligibility on the Athlete.

Mr. Iordache admitted the violation and took responsibility for the administration.
Considering Mr. Iodrach prescribed the product, although he knew that the product contained heptaminol, the ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 4 year period of ineligibility on Mr. Virgil Nicolae Iordache, starting on the date of the decision.

In May 2010 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Cӑtӑlin Burlacu after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance heptaminol.
After notification the Athlete was provisional suspended and heard for the ANAD Hearing Commission.
The Athlete stated he suffered from chronical haemorrhoids and therefore the team physiokinetotherapist prescribed Ginko Fort, which contained heptaminol, together with anti-inflammatories.
The team physiokinetotherapist confirmed the administration of the product and officials argued that the substance does not enhance sports performance in basketball.

The Hearing Commission concludes that the Athlete’s team physiokinetotherapist is responsible for prescribing the product with the prohibited substance. Considering the Athlete’s lack of guilt the ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 3 month period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on 19 May 2010.

In April 2010 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Dan Dumitrache after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance metandienone.
After notification the Athlete was provisional suspended and heard for the ANAD Hearing Commission.
The Athlete stated he had used effort-support substances and medicines as well as naposim (metandienone) and testosterone during the recovery period following the injuries had suffered.

The ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. 28 April 2010.

Facts
The French Rugby Federation (Fédération Française de Rugby, FFR) charges respondent M50 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on February 7, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substance had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFR.
2. The period of ineligibility should be reduced by the period already served in voluntary suspension and by the decision (three months period of ineligibility) of April 29, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFR.
3. The decision, dated April 29, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFR should be modified.
4. The decision will start on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'Athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M49 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an athletics event on May 9, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on prednisolone and prednisone which are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. They are regarded as specified substances.

History
The respondent had used a pharmaceutical to cure angina, which was the cause of the positive test. There was no consultation of a phycisian.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months in which respondent can't take part in competition or sport manifestations organized by the FFA.
2. All the results obtained at the event of May 9, 2010, will be cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Motorcycling Federation (Fédération Française de motocyclisme, FFM) charges respondent M48 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a motorcycling event on February 7, 2010, a sample was taken for doping control purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisone and prednisolone. Prednisone and prednisolone are prohibited substances on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and are regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent used medication to treat sinusitis with otitis, there was a prescription from the physician.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted
2. The earlier decision (three months period of ineligibility), dated April 16, 2010, of the disciplinary committee of the FFM should be modified.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Ball-Trap and Ball Shooting (Fédération Française de Ball-Trap et de Tir a Balle, FFBT) charges respondent M47 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on June 28, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of hydrochlorothiazide. Hydrochlorothiazide is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent admits in writing the use of the prohibited substance, but denies that there was intention to enhance athletic performance.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision will start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Basketball Federation (Fédération Française de Basket-Ball, FFBB) charges respondent M46 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on October 24, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisolone. Prednisolone is prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent used medication against mite allergy and chronic rhinitis, which was the cause of the positive test. He has two medical certificates for this and the results of an allergy test to prove his condition.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision (a warning), dated January 6, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFBB should be modified.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French federation of Full Contact and associated sports (Fédération Française de Sports de Contact et Disciplines Associées, FFSCDA) charges respondent M45 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a full contact match on March 21, 2009, a sample was taken for doping control purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substance had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFSCDA.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.