AFLD 2010 FFBB vs Respondent M37

20 May 2010

Facts
The French Basketball Federation (Fédération Française de Basket-Ball, FFBB) charges respondent M37 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on October 24, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had smoked marijuana for several years. There was no intention to enhance sport performance, she used it to ease her sorrows regarding family problems.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFBB.
2. The decision (3 months period of ineligibility), dated January 27, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFBB should be modified. The period already served leaves a remaining time period of 30 hours
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2010 FFSA vs Respondent M36

20 May 2010

Facts
The French Motor Sports Federation (Fédération Française du Sport Automobile, FFSA) charges respondent M36 or a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a rally on November 29, 2009, a sample was taken for a doping test. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisone and prednisolone. Prednisone and prednisolone are prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list, they are regarded as specified substances.

History
The respondent used medication to treat angina with laryngitis stridulus. He has a certificate from his physician for his prescription.

Decision
1. The sanction will be a period of ineligibility of one month in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFSA.
2. The decision (acquittal) of February 23, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFSA should be modified.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2010 FFBB vs Respondent M35

6 May 2010

Facts
The French Basketball Federation (Fédération Française de Basket-Ball, FFBB) charges respondent M35 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on October 10, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisolone and prednisone. Prednisolone and prednisone are prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and are regarded as a specified substances.

History
The respondent had used medication containing the prohibited substances to treat a flu that was transforming in bronchitis. He has the prescription for this medication.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFBB.
2. The decision (a warning), dated January 6, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFBB should be modified.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Muscle nuclei remember to cheat death

25 Dec 2013

Muscle nuclei remember to cheat death / L.M. Schwartz. – (Journal of physiology (2013) 24 (25 December) : p. 6133-6134) doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.268243.

Comment on:
A cellular memory mechanism aids overload hypertrophy in muscle long after an episodic exposure to anabolic steroids / Ingrid M. Egner, Jo C. Bruusgaard, Einar Eftestøl, Kristian Gundersen. – (Journal of physiology (2013) 24 (28 October) : p. 6221-6230) doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.264457. Epub 2013 Oct 28.

AFLD 2010 FFJDA vs Respondent M34

20 May 2010

Facts
The French Federation for Judo, Jujitsu, Kendo and Associated Disciplines (Fédération Française de Judo, Jujitsu, Kendo et Disciplines Associées FFJDA) charges respondent M34 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. The respondent didn't provide her whereabouts data as being part of the designated testing pool.

History
The respondent had received an earlier sanction for the use of the prohibited substance cannabis. There were exceptional circumstances because respondent had family and financial problems. She even was without fixed home address during these facts.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six weeks.
2. The decision of February 18, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFJDA shouls be modified.
3. The present decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Scientific Opinion on the Regulatory Status of 1,3-Dimethylamylamine (DMAA)

26 Nov 2012

Scientific Opinion on the Regulatory Status of 1,3-Dimethylamylamine (DMAA) / Bastiaan J. Venhuis, Dries de Kaste. – (European Journal of Food Research & Review 2 (2012) 4 (November 26) : p. 93-100)

Content:
- Introduction
- Nomenclature
- Pharmacology
- Intranasal Application
- Oral Application
- Discussion
• Effect on the heart
• Effect on the Blood Pressure
• Effect on the Lungs and the Nose
- Conclusion

1,3-Dimethylamylamine (DMAA) is a pressor amine often found in food supplements for athletes at dosages of 25-65 mg. Historically, the compound has been used as a nasal decongestant but its oral application is largely unstudied leaving the regulatory status of such food supplements as unlicensed medicines undetermined. We therefore reviewed the literature on DMAA and similar amines in order to deduce an effective oral dosage. Based on our findings we conclude that oral preparations with >4 mg DMAA per dose unit should be considered as effective as a bronchodilator. Food supplements that exceed that limit are in fact subject to the Medicines Act and require licensing. Dosages higher than 100-200 mg are expected to cause serious adverse events.

AFLD 2010 FFE vs Respondent M33

15 Sep 2011

Facts
The French Equestrian Federation (Fédération Française d'Équitation, FFE) charges respondent M33 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules.
During an event on November 7, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisolone and prednisone. Prednisolone and prednisone are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and regarded as a specified substances.

History
The respondent didn't provide any explanation about how the prohibited substances had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFE.
2. The decision (a warning) dated February 8, 2010, of the disciplinary committee should be modified.
4. The present decision will start on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2010 FFPJP vs Respondent M32

6 May 2010

Facts
The French Pétanque Federation (Fédération Française de pétanque et jeu provençal, FFPJP)) charges respondent M32 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on September 19, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of atenolol. Atenolol is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and it is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent used medication to treat a myocardical infarction he had, which caused the positive test. He has a medical certificate for this condition.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision (a warning) dated January 25, 2010, of the disciplinary committee of the FFPJP should be modified.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

A cellular memory mechanism aids overload hypertrophy in muscle long after an episodic exposure to anabolic steroids

28 Oct 2013

A cellular memory mechanism aids overload hypertrophy in muscle long after an episodic exposure to anabolic steroids / Ingrid M. Egner, Jo C. Bruusgaard, Einar Eftestøl, Kristian Gundersen. – (Journal of physiology (2013) 24 (28 October) : p. 6221-6230) doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.264457. Epub 2013 Oct 28.

Content:
- Introduction
- Methods
• Animal experiments
• Analysis of testosterone levels in blood
• In vivo myonuclear imaging
• Immunohistochemistry
• Statistics
- Results
- Discussion
• Mechanisms for muscle hypertrophy and memory
• Muscle memory in sport and public health

Previous strength training with or without the use of anabolic steroids facilitates subsequent re-acquisition of muscle mass even after long intervening periods of inactivity. Based on in vivo and ex vivo microscopy we here propose a cellular memory mechanism residing in the muscle cells. Female mice were treated with testosterone propionate for 14 days, inducing a 66% increase in the number of myonuclei and a 77% increase in fibre cross-sectional area. Three weeks after removing the drug, fibre size was decreased to the same level as in sham treated animals, but the number of nuclei remained elevated for at least 3 months (>10% of the mouse lifespan). At this time, when the myonuclei-rich muscles were exposed to overload-exercise for 6 days, the fibre cross-sectional area increased by 31% while control muscles did not grow significantly. We suggest that the lasting, elevated number of myonuclei constitutes a cellular memory facilitating subsequent muscle overload hypertrophy. Our findings might have consequences for the exclusion time of doping offenders. Since the ability to generate new myonuclei is impaired in the elderly our data also invites speculation that it might be beneficial to perform strength training when young in order to benefit in senescence.

Comment in:
Muscle nuclei remember to cheat death / L.M. Schwartz. – (Journal of physiology (2013) 24 (25 December) : p. 6133-6134) doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.268243.

The List of Prohibited Substances and Methods in Sport: Structure and Review Process by the World Anti-Doping Agency

9 Nov 2011

The List of Prohibited Substances and Methods in Sport: Structure and Review Process by the World Anti-Doping Agency / Irene Mazzoni, Osquel Barroso, Olivier Rabin. – (Journal of Analytical Toxicology 35 (2011) 9 (November/December) : p. 608-612) PMID: 22080899
Content:
- Historical Background
- The Prohibited List Under WADA
• Periodic update of the list
• Criteria to include substances or methods in the List
• Categories and subcategories under the List
• Monitoring Program
- Conclusions

The List of Prohibited Substances and Methods (the List) is the International Standard that determines what is prohibited in sport in- and out-of-competition. The official text of the List is produced by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), the international independent organization responsible for promoting, coordinating and monitoring the fight against doping in sport. The drafting of the annual List is a highly interactive and consultative process involving scientific and medical experts in anti-doping, sport federations and governments. In this article, the elements that compose the List as well as the process behind its annual revision and update are presented.

Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin