Facts
The Fédération Française Handisport (FFH) charges respondent M91 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a wheelchair football match, on November 27, 2010, the respondent provided a sample for doping tests. His sample tested positive on a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent has indicated the use of cannabis two or three times a week, he receives it from a specialized care centre.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFH.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served by the decision of March 19, 2011, by the disciplinary committee of the FFH.
3. The decision of March 19, 2011, by the disciplinary committee of the FFH should be modified.
4. The decision will take effect on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved

Facts
The French Federation of Sport Clubs and Art of Defence (Fédération des Clubs Sportifs et Artistiques de la Défense, FCSAD) charges respondent M90 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a country-cross on December 12, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis showed the presence of clenbuterol which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
Respondent had not been able to explain how the prohibited substance had entered her body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FCSAD, as pronounced on May 2, 2011, by the disciplinary committee of the FCSAD but extended to related French sport federations.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Rugby Federation (Fédération Française de Rugby, FFR) charges respondent M89 or a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on January 6, 2011, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on boldenone or it's metabolite, trenbolone and nandrolone or it's metabolite. These substances are prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent had used product obtained from the Internet to improve his muscle-mass, these products are the cause of the positive doping test. He used them for two months to improve his chances for becoming a professional rugby-player.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of four years, in which the respondent can't take part in competition or sports manifestations organized or authorized by the FFR, as pronounced by the decision, dated May 26, 2011, from the disciplinary committee of the FFR but extended to all related French sport federations.
2. The decision will start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

In January 2012 the Koninklijke Nederlandse Krachtsport en Fitnessfederatie (KNKF), the Royal Netherlands Power Sport and Fitness Federation, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substances methylhexaneamine (dimethylpentylamine) and cannabis.

After notification the KNKF ordered a provisional suspension. The Athlete filed a statement in his defence and waived his right to be heard for the KNKF Disciplinary Committee.
The Athlete admitted he smoked cannabis prior to the doping test and that the prohibited substance methylhexaneamine came into his body due to the use of the supplement BPI A.5.0, purchased in a supplement store.

The Committee concludes that the Athlete acted negligently due to he failed to research the ingredients of his supplements before using. Therefore the KNKF Disciplinary Committee decides to impose a 1 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. 17 January 2012.

In June 2011 the Koninklijke Nederlandse Cricket Bond (KNCB), the Royal Netherlands Cricket Association, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance cannabis.
After notification the Athlete filed a statement in his defence and was heard for the KNCB Disciplinary Committee. The Athlete admitted he used cannabis out of competition a week before the doping test during the festivities on 30 April 2011.

Considering the Athlete had no intention to enhance his sport performance the KNCB Disciplinary Committee decides to impose a 6 month period on the Athlete starting on the date of the decision.
Fees and expenses for this committee shall be borne by the Athlete.

In June 2011 the Nederlandse Golf Federatie (NGF), the Netherlands Golf Federation, has reported an anti-doping violation against the Athlete after his A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substances methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA).

The Athlete admitted he used ecstasy 3 days prior to the doping test, during the festivities on 29 and 30 April 2011. The Athlete wasn’t tested before and stated that he was unfamiliar with the anti-doping rules and anti-doping education.

Considering the circumstances and without intention to enhance sport performance the NGF Disciplinary Committee decides to impose a 1 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on 26 May 2011.

Facts
The French Motor Sports Federation (Fédération Française du Sport Automobile, FFSA) charges respondent M88 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a Motor Sports event on October 23, 2010, a sample was taken for a doping test. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cocaine. Cocaine is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent had willingly taken cocaine mixed in a glass of whiskey during a festivity a few days before the doping test. There was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction will be a period of ineligibility of three months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFSA.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the time all-ready served in voluntary suspension and the time served by the first instance decision of February 8, 2011, by the disciplinary committee of the FFSA.
3. The decision (acquittal) of the disciplinary committee of the FFSA, dated March 24, 2011, should be modified.
4. The decision will start on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published en sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Tennis Federation (Fédération Française de Tennis, FFT) charges respondent M87 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on November 27, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World-Anti Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substance had entered his body

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFT.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served by the decision (three months period of ineligibility), dated May 2, 2010, of the disciplinary committee of the FFT.
3. The decision, dated May 2, 2010, of the disciplinary committee of the FFT should be modified.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Equestrian Federation (Fédération Française d'Équitation, FFE) charges respondent M86 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules.
During a concours on August 22, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used the prohibited substance three day before the doping test in a festivity setting. It was offered to her without knowing that it was prohibited, she argues that the low concentration indicates passive smoking. There was no intention by her to enhance sport performance. However the concentration is four times higher than the threshold value which indicates the consumption of cannabis.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of 6 months, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFE or the French equestrian society.
2. All the results obtained at August 22, 2010, are cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
4. The present decision will start on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Sailing Federation (Fédération Française de Voile, FFV) charges respondent M85 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. The respondent failed to provide his whereabouts data as being part of a registered testing pool for doping control.

History
The respondent didn't comply because of negligence and his displacements due to the frequency of displacement related to his sport.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFV.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served by the decision (three months of ineligibility) of March 14, 2011.
3. The decision of March 14, 2011, of the disciplinary committee of the FFV will be modified.
4.The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.