AFLD 2012 FFR vs Respondent M97

8 Nov 2012

Facts
The French Rugby Federation (Fédération Française de Rugby, FFR) charges respondent M97 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on January 18, 2012, a sample was taken for a doping test. The sample tested positive on terbutaline which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Terbutaline is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent explains that the positive test is caused by medications he used to treat asthma. He has proof of negligence by the French Anti-Doping Agency for not receiving a Therapeutic Use Exemption (Tue).

Decision
1. The respondent receives a warning.
2. The decision of March 8, 2012, from the disciplinary committee of the FFR is cancelled.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2012 FFA vs Respondent M96

8 Nov 2012

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'Athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M96 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a semi-marathon event on May 20, 2012, a sample for doping test purposes was taken. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of tuaminoheptane. Tuaminoheptane is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and considered as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used the remains of medication for her child, a spray that contained the prohibited substance. The respondent did know it contained the prohibited substance.

Decision.
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFA.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by three months which was the period already served in voluntary suspension.
3. The decision (3 months period of ineligibility) dated May 31, 2012, of the disciplinary committee of the FFA will be modified.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

ISI 2010_4 ISI Anti-Doping Committee vs X

14 Jul 2010

In June 2010 Lyfjaráð ÍSÍ, the Iceland ISI Anti-Doping Committee, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the minor Player after her sample tested positive for the prohibited substance cannabis.
After notification the Player was heard for the ISI Tribunal. The Player admitted she used cannabis out of competition.
Without intention to enhance her sport performance the ISI Tribunal decides to impose a 6 month period of ineligibility on the Player.

ISI 2011_4 ISI Anti-Doping Committee vs Hrannari Guðmundsson

25 Aug 2011

In June 2011 Lyfjaráð ÍSÍ, the Iceland ISI Anti-Doping Committee, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Hrannari Guðmundsson after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance cannabis. After notification the Athlete was heard for the ISI Tribunal.
The Athlete admitted he used cannabis out of competition, which was confirmed by the levels of the prohibited substance found in the doping test.
Without intention to enhance his sport performance the ISI Tribunal decides to impose a 6 month period of ineligibility on the Player, starting on the date of the notification, i.e. on 23 June 2011.

AFLD 2012 FFSquash vs Respondent M95

8 Nov 2012

Facts
The French Squach Federation (Fédération Française de Squash, FFSquash) charges respondent M95 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a squash tournament on February 11, 2012, a sample for a doping test purposes was taken. The sample tested positive for a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the Word Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Cannabis is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't provide any explanation about how the prohibited substance had entered his body.

Decision
1 The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFSquash.
2. The decision (1 year and six months period of ineligibility) dated June 27, 2012, of the disciplinary committee of the FFSquash will be modified.
3. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served due to the decision of June 27, 2012.
4. All the results obtained at the event on February 11, 2012, will be canceled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
5. The decision will start on the date of notification.
6. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved

AFLD 2012 FFSquash vs Respondent M94

8 Nov 2012

Facts
The French Squach Federation (Fédération Française de Squash, FFSquash) charges respondent M94 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a squash tournament on February 11, 2012, a sample for a doping test purposes was taken. The sample tested positive for cathine. Cathine is a prohibited substance according the Word Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Cathine is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used a medicine against a cold on advise of his physician. This medicine was the cause of the positive test result because it contained pseudoephedrine which metabolizes into
cathine.

1 The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFSquash.
2. The decision dated June 27, 2012, of the disciplinary committee of the FFSquash will be modified.
3. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served due to the decision of June 27, 2012.
4. All the results obtained at the event on February 11, 2012, will be canceled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
5. The decision will start on the date of notification.
6. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2012 FFSquash vs Respondent M93

8 Nov 2012

Facts
The French Squach Federation (Fédération Française de Squash, FFSquash) charges respondent M93 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a squash tournament on February 11, 2012, a sample for a doping test purposes was taken. The sample tested positive for a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the Word Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Cannabis is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used the cannabis during in a recreational setting in the weekend before the doping control. There was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1 The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFSquash.
2. The decision (1 year and 6 months period of ineligibility) dated June 27, 2012, of the disciplinary committee of the FFSquash will be modified.
3. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served due to the decision of June 27, 2012.
4. All the results obtained at the event on February 11, 2012, will be canceled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
5. The decision will start on the date of notification.
6. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2012 FFA vs Respondent M92

24 Oct 2012

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'Athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M92 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an athletic event on June 23, 2012, a sample for doping test purposes was taken. The sample tested positive on prednisolone and a high level of testerone above epitestosterone. A complementary spectrometric analysis showed an exogen origin of metabolites of testosterone. Prednisolene and testosterone of exogen origin are prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substances had entered his body.

Decision.
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by French sport federations.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already fulfilled in voluntary suspension.
3. All the results obtained at the event on June 23, 2012, will be cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2012 FFS vs Respondent M91

24 Oct 2012

Facts
The French Ski Federation (Fédération Française de Ski, FFS) charges respondent M90 with a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a ski event on March 31, 2012, de respondent underwent a doping test. His sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Cannabis is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used the cananis in a recreational setting, there was not intention to enhance sport performances.

Decision
1. The sanction is a six months period of ineligibility in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFS.
2. The decision (warning and fine of 500 euros) dated June 8, 2012, of the disciplinary committee of the FFS will be modified.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2012 FFS vs Respondent M90

24 Oct 2012

Facts
The French Ski Federation (Fédération Française de Ski, FFS) charges respondent M90 with a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During ski event on February 25, 2012, de respondent underwent a doping test. His sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Cannabis is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent admitted in writing the use of cannabis. The decision dated May 23, 2012, of the disciplinary committee of the FFS was a warning and a fine of 500 euros. Respondent wants to be acquitted of the fine.

Decision
1. The sanction is a four months period of ineligibility in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFS.
2. The decision dated May 23, 2012, of the disciplinary committee of the FFS will be modified.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin