AFLD 2012 FFL vs Respondent M73

27 Sep 2012

Facts
The French Wrestling Federation (Fédération Française de Lutte, FFL) charges respondent M73 for a violaton of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on November 19, 2011, a sample was taken for doping control purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisolone and prednisone. Prednisolone and prednisone are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and regarded as specified substances.

History
The respondent claimed he used medication or therapeutic purposes
to treat asthma. He has a certificate of his physician and some medical investigations.

Decision
1. The decision dated February 24, 2012, of the disciplinary committee of the FFL is cancelled.
2. The respondent is acquitted.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

ISI 2012_9 ISI Anti-Doping Committee vs A

13 Jun 2012

In May 2012 Lyfjaráð ÍSÍ, the Iceland ISI Anti-Doping Committee, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Player after her sample tested positive for the prohibited substance clenbuterol.
At the time of the violation the Player had just become 18 years old. The ISI Tribunal approved the request of the athlete to publish the verdict anonymously. The Player argued that she was from a small town and that could harm her to have her name publicly published.

The Player admitted the use of the substance with the purpose to lose weight. She used the substance not for handball, but for the training of a fitness competition. The Player did not know the substance can improve sport performance and gave the ISI information about the persons who provided her with the substance.
The Player´s lawyer filed documents from her school and psychology. They stated that the Player is diagnosed with ADHD and is quite impulsive, attended cognitive and behavioural therapy and has a very low self-esteem.

Considering the circumstance, the ISI Tribunal decides to impose a 6 month period of ineligibility on the Player, starting on 30 March 2012.

AFLD 2012 FFA vs Respondent M72

27 Sep 2012

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'Athlétisme,FFA) charges respondent M72 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a athletics event on November 27, 2011, a sample for doping test purposes was taken. The sample tested positive on a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't want to improve athletic performance and claimed that the occasional use of this substance was because of difficult personal circumstances.

Decision.
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFA.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduce by the period already served by the sanction of May 3, 2012, by the disciplinary committee of the FFA.
3. The decision (period ineligibility of three months) of May 3, 2012, by disciplinary committee of the FFA will be modified.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2012 FFBB vs Respondent M71

27 Sep 2012

Facts
The French Basketball Federation (Fédération Française de Basket-Ball, FFBB) charges respondent M71 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on February 12, 2012, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent claims the positive test was the result of passive smoking during a festivity.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFBB.
2. The decision will start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

ISI 2013_7 ISI Anti-Doping Committee vs Eiriki Inga Kristinssyni

7 Oct 2013

In July 2013 Lyfjaráð ÍSÍ, the Iceland ISI Anti-Doping Committee, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Player Eiriki Inga Kristinssyni after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance metandienone.
Considering the committed violation and without the Athlete's statement, the ISI Tribunal decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Player, starting on 12 June 2013.

ISI 2013_6 ISI Anti-Doping Committee vs Javier Fernandez Valino

28 May 2013

In March 2013 Lyfjaráð ÍSÍ, the Iceland ISI Anti-Doping Committee, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Player Javier Fernandez Valino after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance cannabis.
After notification the Player was provisional suspended. The Player filed a statement in his defence and was heard for the Tribunal of the National Olympic and Sport Association of Iceland (ISI).

The Player admitted he smoked cannabis two weeks before the doping test.
The ISI Tribunal decides to impose a 6 month period of ineligibility on the Player, starting on 16 April 2013.

AFLD 2012 FFC vs Respondent M70

6 Sep 2012

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M70 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on November 26, 2011, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of hydrochlorothiazide which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Hydrochlorathiazide is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent claims that the positive test result came from taking a dietary supplement for aesthetic reasons.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFC.
2. All results obtained at the cycling event on November 26, 2011, are cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

ISI 2013_2 ISI Anti-Doping Committee vs X

6 May 2013

In March 2013 Lyfjaráð ÍSÍ, the Iceland ISI Anti-Doping Committee, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Player X after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance metandienone.
After notification the Player was provisional suspended. The Player filed a statement in his defence and was heard for the Tribunal of the National Olympic and Sport Association of Iceland (ISI).

The Player stated he had accepted a nutritional drink from his brother and did not know it contained the prohibited substance metandienone (Dianebol). The Player argued that he had no intention to enhance his sport performance due to the prohibited substance has no effect on concentration and precision needed in bowling.

Considering the Player acted negligently the ISI Tribunal decides to impose a 6 month period of ineligibility on the Player, starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 22 February 2013.

AFLD 2012 FFV vs Respondent M69

6 Sep 2012

Facts
The French Sailing Federation (Fédération Française de Voile, FFV) charges respondent M69 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a sailing match on September 25, 2011, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Cannabis is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used cannabis after the separation of his girl-friend and child, for which he has documented proof.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of 4 months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFV.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served in voluntary suspension.
3. The decision ( a ban for a period between April 102012 and
June 14, 2012) dated April 19, 2012, of the disciplinary committee of the FFV will be modified.
4.The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2012 FFC vs Respondent M68

6 Sep 2012

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M68 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on November, 2011, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on the prohibited substance heptaminol and a metabolite of nandrolone. Heptaminol and nandrolone are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency prohibited list.

History
The respondent explained that the positive finding of heptaminol came from a medicine used against venous insufficiency calf. The positive finding of nandrolone came from a supplement used to increase mass and pedaling power.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the French sport federations.
2. The present decision shall take effect from the date of notification
to the respondent. It will apply until the end of (the execution of the punishment inflicted on January 26, 2012 by disciplinary committee of the FFC and confirmed on March 21, 2012 by the appeal board of the federation.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin