Facts
The French Handball Federation (Fédération Française de Handball, FFHB) charges respondent M51 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a handball meeting on December 15, 2012, a sample for doing test was taken. The sample tested positive on a metabolite of cannabis which is a prohibited substance on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Cannabis is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent claims no tot have used the prohibited substance for enhancing sport performance. Inhalation of the smoke from a person who stays with her was the cause of the positive test. But the measured amount doesn't match the results of passive smoking of cannabis.

Decision
1. The sanction will be a period of ineligibility of 6 months in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFHB.
2. The earlier decision, dated March 11, 2013, of the disciplinary committee of the FFHB will be cancelled.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M50 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cyclo-cross on December 24, 2012, the respondent was selected for a doping control, however the respondent didn't attend the doping control.

History
Due to technical problems with his bike the respondent returned to his car for storing his bike, he didn't receive or see any message regarding being assigned for doping control.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision February 15, 2013, from the disciplinary committee of the FFC is cancelled.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Football Federation (Fédération Française de Football, FFF) charges respondent M49 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on September 22, 2012, a sample was taken for doping control. The sample tested positive on a metabolite of cannabis.

Decision
1. The sanction will be a period of 6 months of ineligibility in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFF.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period all-ready served in voluntary suspension.
3. The decision of the disciplinary committee, dated December 19, 2012, will be modified.
4. The decision will start on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération française d'athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M48 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an athletics event called "Grand Ménestrail" the respondent was selected for a doping test.

History
Despite messages and announcements the respondent didn't show up for the doping test.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of 2 years in which the athlete can't take part in competition and manifestations organized by the FFA and related sports federation.
2. All his results gained at the athletics event are cancelled. Medals, points and prices are withdrawn.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M47 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event "la Tarbaise", on September 30, 2012, a sample was taken for a doping test. His sample tested positive on prednisolone which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Prednisolone is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used a medicine to treat nasopharyngitis, this medicine contained the prohibited substance. He has a certificate for the use of this medicine.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision is published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Rugby Federation (Fédération Française de Rugby, FFR) charges respondent M46 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on November 18, 2012, a sample was taken for a doping test. The sample tested positive on a metabolite of cannabis which is a prohibited substance on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Cannabis is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used cannabis the eve before the doping test, but it was not his attention to enhance his sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction will be a period of ineligibility of 6 months in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFR.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced with the period of voluntary suspension.
3. The earlier decision of the disciplinary committee of the FFR will be cancelled.
4. The decision will start on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Motor Sports Federation (Fédération Française du Sport Automobile, FFSA) charges respondent M45 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a Motor Sports event "la vingtième edition des 24 heures Tout Terrain" on September 16, 2012, a sample was taken for a doping test. The sample showed the presence of morphine which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Morphine is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent denies that he had used morphine to enhance his sport performance. The cause of the positive test can be medicine he absorbed at a urgent treatment in the hospital for a kidney stone or a medicine he used for whiplash and headaches.

Decision
1. The sanction will be a period of ineligibility of 9 months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFSA.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the time all-ready served in voluntary suspension.
3. The decision of the disciplinary committee of the FFSA, dated January 28, 2012, will be modified.
4. The decision will start on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published en sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Baseball and Softball Federation (Fédération Française de Baseball et Softball, FFBS) charges respondent M44 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a baseball event the respondent provided a sample for a doping test. His sample tested positive on methylhexaneamine which is a prohibited substance according to the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Methylhexaneamine is a specified substance.

History
The respondenthas denied throughout the proceedings, that he willfully consumed methylhexanamine, the positivite test of the urine may result either from the of an energy drink, or a nasal spray he used to treat a cold he has suffered from during the week prior to doping control.

Decision
1. The sanction will be a period of ineligibility of 6 months in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFBS.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period of voluntary suspension.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M43 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an cycling event "la sixième étape du Tour de Martinique de cyclisme" on July 12, 2012, the respondent provided a sample for doping tests. The sample revealed the presence of erythropoietin which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent didn't give any explanation about how the prohibited substance entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of 2 years in which the respondent can't take part in competitions or manifestations related to his sports federations.
2. All the results gained at the sport event dated July 12, 2012, are nullified. Medals, points and prices are withdrawn.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The - French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M42 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an cycling event on September 1, 2012, the respondent was selected for a doping test.

History
The respondent didn't finish the cycling event and went home, there he was informed by phone that he was selected for a doping test and had to respond. He claims not to have been informed on time.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision, dated December 11, 2012, of the disciplinary committee of the FFC is nullified.
3. The decision is published and sent to the parties involved.