UKAD 2010 UKAD vs Samuel Thompson

Facts
The UK Anti-Doping organization ("UKAD") charges Samuel Thompson ("player") for an anti-doping rule violation. The player was tested on December 10, 2009. The urine sample he provided was found to contain 2-alpha-methyl-5-alpha-androstan-3-alpha-ol-17-one, a metabolite of drostanolone. By e-mail the player admits having used the prohibited substance which made the B-sample analyses unnecessary. The oral hearing was held on April 29, 2010.

History
By e-mail the player made clear that he will not attend an oral hearing due to work obligations. He sees the substance drostanolone as a mild form of steroid which in many cases wouldn't improve his performance. He took this substance solely down to joint pain and with an insight to correcting old injuries.

Decision
1. Doping Offence contrary to Article 2.1 of the Rules has been established.
2. The period of ineligibility imposed is two years starting on January 30, 2010, and ending at midnight on January 29, 2012.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
6 May 2010
Arbitrator
Crystal, Terry
Quinlan, Christopher
Vernon, Judy
Original Source
UK Anti-Doping (UKAD)
Country
United Kingdom
Language
English
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Legal Terms
Admission
No intention to enhance performance
Waiver of "right to be heard"
Sport/IFs
Rugby (WR) - World Rugby
Other organisations
UK Anti-Doping (UKAD)
Doping classes
S1. Anabolic Agents
Substances
Drostanolone
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
19 August 2013
Date of last modification
6 April 2016
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin