UKAD 2013 UKAD vs Ceri Davies

Facts
The UK Anti-Doping Limited (“UKAD”) charged Ceri Davies (the “Athlete”) for a omission of the Anti-Doping Rules. On October 1, 2011, during a competition match the Athlete provided an urine sample for analysis. The analysis revealed the presence of 2-alpha-methyl-5-alpha-androstan-3-alpha-ol-17-one, a metabolite of drostanolone which is a prohibited substance on the WADA list 2011. On November 14, 2011, the Athlete admitted the charge in writing and acceded to the consequences specified in the charge.

Decision
1. An Anti-Doping Rule Violation contrary to Article 2.1 has been established;
2. A period of Ineligibility of two years is imposed;
3. That period of Ineligibility is deemed to have commenced as from November 3, 2011, and therefore will end at midnight on November 2, 2013.
d. The Athlete’s status during this period of Ineligibility shall be as set out in Article 10.10:

Appeal
The athlete, the WRU (Welsh Rugby Union), the International Rugby Board and the World Anti-Doping Agency have a right of appeal.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
5 December 2012
Original Source
UK Anti-Doping (UKAD)
Country
United Kingdom
Language
English
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Legal Terms
Admission
Sport/IFs
Rugby (WR) - World Rugby
Other organisations
UK Anti-Doping (UKAD)
Laboratories
London, United Kingdom: Drug Control Centre
Doping classes
S1. Anabolic Agents
Substances
Drostanolone
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
30 August 2013
Date of last modification
6 April 2016
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin