UKAD 2013 UKAD vs Ryan Llewellyn - Appeal

The UK Anti-Doping Limited ("UKAD") appeals against the desicon of the UK Antii-Doping Panel dated November 27, 2012. In this decision Ryan Llewellyn (the "Athlete") received an award of one year ineligibility for the use of the prohibited substance Methylhexaneamine, (“MHA”).

Issues at the hearing
The appeal committee is surprised that the UKAD makes a distinction between the use of a specified substance out-of-competition or in-competition.
It has to be determined if the specified prohibited substance was taken to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1. The UKAD's appeal is dismissed
2. An appeal can be made by the relevant international federation or by WADA by appeal to CAS.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
14 February 2013
Arbitrator
Casement, David
Englehart, Robert
Leaver, Peter
Original Source
UK Anti-Doping (UKAD)
Country
United Kingdom
Language
English
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Legal Terms
Admission
No intention to enhance performance
No Significant Fault or Negligence
Period of ineligibility
Specified substance
Sport/IFs
Boxing (IBA) - International Boxing Association
Other organisations
UK Anti-Doping (UKAD)
Laboratories
London, United Kingdom: Drug Control Centre
Doping classes
S6. Stimulants
Substances
4-Methylhexan-2-amine (methylhexaneamine, 1,3-dimethylamylamine, 1,3 DMAA)
Various
Out-of-competition use / Substances of Abuse
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
2 September 2013
Date of last modification
6 April 2016
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin