UKAD 2013 UKAD vs Craig Windsor Jnr

Facts
The UK Anti-Doping Limited ("UKAD") charged Craig Windsor Jnr (the "athlete") for an omission of the Anti-Doping Rules ("ADR"). The athlete was charged with three anti-doping rule violations: on a number of occasions in January 2013 he used or attempted to use oxandrolone; sometime in December 2012 and/or January 2013 he possessed oxandrolone; on or about January 9, 2013, he possessed stanozolol. The athlete admitted the violations but doens't agree with a period of ineligibility of four years. The facts are unusual and based on messages he sent using his facebook account.

Decision
1. The Anti-Doping rule violations have been established.
2. The period of ineligibility imposed is three years nine months from March 6, 2013 (the four years are corrected with the period of voluntary suspension).

Appeal
An appeal can be made within 21 days of receipt hereof.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
30 April 2013
Arbitrator
Johnson, Lorraine
O'Driscoll, Barry
Quinlan, Christopher
Original Source
UK Anti-Doping (UKAD)
Country
United Kingdom
Language
English
ADRV
Possession
Use / attempted use
Legal Terms
Admission
Aggravating circumstances
Circumstantial evidence
Digital evidence / information
Multiple violations
Period of ineligibility
Sport/IFs
Boxing (IBA) - International Boxing Association
Other organisations
UK Anti-Doping (UKAD)
Doping classes
S1. Anabolic Agents
Substances
Oxandrolone
Stanozolol
Various
Internet / Social media
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
3 September 2013
Date of last modification
23 January 2023
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin