UKAD 2013 RFU vs Jack Warrington

Facts
The Rugby Football Union ("RFU") charged Jack Warrington (the "Player”) for an omission of the Anti-Doping Rules. On 10 November 2012, provided a urine sample for a doping control test. The sample returned an adverse analytical finding which highlighted the presence of Methylhexaneamine (“MHA”) which is classified as a prohibited substance.

History
The player used several supplements, some were indicated not being the source of the contamination, others couldn't be tested. The Player made no further representations as to the inhaler he bought on holiday in Portugal being the source of the MHA.

Decision
The sanction imposed for this anti-doping rule violation is a period of ineligibility of two years for the Player commencing 23rd November 2012 (the date upon which the Player was notified of the adverse analytical finding and provisionally suspended) and concluding on (but inclusive of) 23rd November 2014. In the meantime, the Player’s status is that governed by IRB Regulation.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
24 May 2013
People
Davies, Antony M.
Original Source
UK Anti-Doping (UKAD)
Country
United Kingdom
Language
English
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Legal Terms
Sole Arbitrator
Sport/IFs
Rugby (WR) - World Rugby
Other organisations
Rugby Football Union (RFU)
Doping classes
S6. Stimulants
Substances
4-Methylhexan-2-amine (methylhexaneamine, 1,3-dimethylamylamine, 1,3 DMAA)
Various
Supplements
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
5 September 2013
Date of last modification
8 January 2020
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin