SDT 2004_07 Cycling NZ vs Stephen Collins

In June 2004 the New Zealand Sports Drug Agency (NZSDA) and Cycling New Zealand Federation (Cycling NZ) have reported an anti-doping rule violation against the cyclist Stephen Collins after he refused to provide a sample to NZSDA.

After the notification the Athlete filed a statement in his defence and a decision was rendered by the Tribunal based on the parties submissions.
The Athlete explained that he was disillusioned with cycling in April 2004 and had informed Cycling NZ about his retirement. He expected that Cycling NZ would request NZSDA to remove him from the Sports Drug Testing Register. He also complained about the failure of Cycling NZ to comply with the two day time limit under the Rules.

Cycling NZ established that the Athlete was still registered as a member. It acknowledged that it had not forwarded the NZSDA’s notice of the determination of a drug infraction timely as required.
Cycling NZ accepted that the Athlete may have been upset and angry when he refused to provide a sample to NZSDA. Cycling NZ also recognises that whether the Athlete was full aware of the consequences of his refusal he might have been more co-operative to the doping control and he might have provided a sample.

The Tribunal considered whether Cycling NZ’s failure to provide the Athlete's with timely notice of the determination of the Board of the NZSDA has deprived him of an effective right of appeal or challenge to the NZSDA Board’s determination. The matters relied upon by the Athlete may be relevant, however, in mitigation of penalty, to the extent that the Tribunal has any discretion in that regard.

On 17 August 2004 the Sports Disputes Tribunal of New Zealand decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the notification, i.e. on 11 June 2004.

In addition the Tribunal made some recommendations that might encourage national sports organisations and athletes who are covered by the Anti-Doping Rules to look closely at, and adhere to, their respective responsibilities under the anti-doping rules.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
17 August 2004
Arbitrator
Castle, Timothy J.
Palmer, Farah
Quirk, Carol
Toogood, Kit
Original Source
Sports Disputes Tribunal of New Zealand
Country
New Zealand
Language
English
ADRV
Refusal or failure to submit to sample collection
Legal Terms
Competence / Jurisdiction
Procedural error
Right to appeal
Rules & regulations National Sports Organisations & National Anti-Doping Organisations
Substantial delay / lapsed time limit
Waiver of "right to be heard"
Sport/IFs
Cycling (UCI) - International Cycling Union
Other organisations
Cycling New Zealand Federation (Cycling NZ)
Drug Free Sport New Zealand (DFSNZ)
New Zealand Sports Drug Agency (NZSDA)
Various
Education
Retirement
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
22 October 2013
Date of last modification
20 February 2020
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin