SDT 2006_08 Softball New Zealand vs Aaron Neemia

Related case:
ST 2009_02 DFSNZ vs Aaron Neemia
June 12, 2009

Softball New Zealand (SNZ) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Respondent after he tested positive for the prohibited substance Cannabis.
Respondent filed a statement in his defence and waived his right to be heard before the Tribunal. Respondent admitted he had smoked Cannabis at a party the night before competition.
The Tribunal concludes that Respondent did not smoke Cannabis to enhance sport performance.
Therefore the Sports Disputes Tribunal of New Zealand decides to impose a warning and a reprimand on the Respondent.

Related documents

Original document

STNZ 2006 neemia-decision.pdf

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
7 April 2006
Arbitrator
Greenwood, Adrienne
Paterson, Barry
Quirk, Carol
Original Source
Sports Disputes Tribunal of New Zealand
Country
New Zealand
Language
English
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Legal Terms
No intention to enhance performance
Reprimand / warning
Sport/IFs
Baseball-Softball (WBSC) - World Baseball-Softball Confederation
Other organisations
Drug Free Sport New Zealand (DFSNZ)
Softball New Zealand (SNZ)
Laboratories
Sydney, Australia: Australian Sports Drug Testing Laboratory (ASDTL) - Sydney (AUS)
Doping classes
S8. Cannabinoids
Substances
Cannabis (THC)
Various
Out-of-competition use / Substances of Abuse
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
28 October 2013
Date of last modification
12 September 2016
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin