SDRCC 2010 Taylor Shadgett vs CCES

Facts
Claimant Taylor Shadgett and respondent Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport (CCES) and the interveners Arcadia university and the Canadian Interuniversity Sport took part in a resolution hearing conducted by telephone conference on July 15, 2010.
The claimant was called to give an urine sample through the normal testing process on June 7, 2010. His sample tested positive on Stanozolol which is a prohibited substance.

History
When tested the claimant had admitted the ingestion of the steroid Winstrol in the previous ten days.

Decision
The claimant did commit an anti-doping violation by the presence in his body and use of Winstrol, a prohibited substance, contrary to the Doping Violations and Consequences Rules of the Canadian Anti-Doping Program. The Tribunal therefore imposes a two year period of ineligibility to be calculated from June 7, 2010.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
22 July 2010
Arbitrator
Picher, Michel G.
Original Source
Sport Dispute Resolution Centre of Canada (SDRCC) - Centre de règlement des différends sportifs du Canada (CRDSC)
Country
Canada
Language
English
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Legal Terms
Admission
Sport/IFs
American Football (IFAF) - International Federation of American Football
Other organisations
Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport (CCES)
Canadian Interuniversity Sport (CIS)
Canadian University Sports (U Sports)
Sport Dispute Resolution Centre of Canada (SDRCC)
Doping classes
S1. Anabolic Agents
Substances
Stanozolol
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
12 November 2013
Date of last modification
24 September 2020
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin