SAIDS 2011_35 SAIDS vs Harald Pieter van Staden

SAIDS 2011_35 IRB vs Harald Pieter van Staden & SAIDS - Appeal
July 2, 2012

The South African Institute for Drug-Free Sport (SAIDS) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substance drostanolone.
After notification a provisional suspension was ordered. The Athlete submitted that he will not attend the hearing of the Disciplinary Committee.

The Athlete gave no explanation to the Committee as to how the substance entered his bode due to his failure to attend the hearing. The Committee notes that there was no indication from the Athlete that he had refrained from participating in the sport from the date he received the notification of the provisional suspension.
Therefore the SAIDS Disciplinary Committee decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility starting on the date of the hearing.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
19 December 2011
Arbitrator
Fleiser, Leon
Motaung, Sello
Samuel, Siven
Original Source
South African Institute for Drug-Free Sport (SAIDS)
Country
South Africa
Language
English
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Legal Terms
Provisional suspension
Waiver of "right to be heard"
Sport/IFs
Rugby (WR) - World Rugby
Other organisations
South African Institute for Drugfree Sport (SAIDS)
Laboratories
Bloemfontein, South Africa: South African Doping Control Laboratory
Doping classes
S1. Anabolic Agents
Substances
Drostanolone
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
5 December 2013
Date of last modification
28 February 2018
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin