Striking down the “Osaka Rule” – An unnecessary departure

Striking down the “Osaka Rule” – An unnecessary departure / Jan F. Orth. – (International Sports Law Journal (2012) 3-4 : p. 28-34)

Content:
1.) Introduction
1.1.) The sport politics background
1.2.) Factual background of the case
2.) The decision of the Court of Arbitration for Sport
3.) Critical Review
4.) Conclusion

The reasoning of the CAS in its decision CAS 2011/O/2422, which strikes down the “Osaka Rule”, consists of 23 single-spaced pages and seems therefore to be well substantiated.
However, a critical review of the reasoning reveals remarkable shortcomings in the argumentation scheme of the competent CAS panel. The author reaches the result that the invalidation of this important anti-doping provision was not compelling at all.

Original document

Parameters

Date
1 July 2012
People
Orth, Jan F.
Original Source
T.M.C. Asser Institute
Country
Germany
Language
English
Legal Terms
Ne bis in idem
Osaka Rule
Removal of accreditation for the Olympic Games
Rules & regulations IOC
Other organisations
International Olympic Committee (IOC)
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport (TAS) - Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)
United States Olympic Committee (USOC)
Document category
Scientific article
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
2 May 2014
Date of last modification
10 September 2018
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin