UKAD 2013 RFU vs Harrison Pickett

Facts
The Rugby Football Union (RFU) charged Harrison Pickett (the Athlete) for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. On October 3, 2013, the athlete was selected for a doping test. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of oxymetholone. Oxymetholone is a prohibited substance according the regulations of the Internation Rugby Board (IRB).

History
One day after the doping test the athlete informed the Director of Elite Sport at Hartpury College, Phil De Glanville, that he had been taking winstrol to treat an injury. This substance is the cause of the positive test. This information was forwarded to the UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) and the RFU and is seen as a prompt admission.

Decision
The Panel has imposed a two year period of ineligibility on the athlete commencing on 9 October 2013. The period expires at midnight on 8 October 2015.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
19 November 2013
Arbitrator
Abrahams, Siobhan
Morris, Julian
Rees, Tom
Original Source
UK Anti-Doping (UKAD)
Country
United Kingdom
Language
English
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Use / attempted use
Legal Terms
Admission
Sport/IFs
Rugby (WR) - World Rugby
Other organisations
Rugby Football Union (RFU)
UK Anti-Doping (UKAD)
Laboratories
London, United Kingdom: Drug Control Centre
Doping classes
S1. Anabolic Agents
Substances
Oxymetholone
Medical terms
Physical injury
Treatment / self-medication
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
12 May 2014
Date of last modification
15 July 2014
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin