TAD 2014_196 Respondent vs AEPSAD

On 24 September 2014 the Spanish Agency for the Protection of Health in Sport (Agencia Española de Protección de la Salud en el Deporte, AEPSAD) decided to impose a 1 year period of ineligibility on the respondent after his A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substance cannabis.

Hereafter in October 2014 the respondent appealed the AEPSAD decision with the Tribunal Administrativo del Deporte (TAD), the Spanish Disciplinary Committee for Sports.
The respondent requested to impose a warning and argued that he fully cooperated in this case as first violation and without intention to enhance sport performance.
The Tribunal rejects the respondents arguments and concludes that with no significant negligence the imposed sanction was proportional.
Therefore on 4 December 2014 the Tribunal decides to dismiss the respondent’s appeal and confirmes the AEPSAD decision of 24 September 2014.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
4 December 2014
Arbitrator
Cardenal Carro, Miguel
Original Source
Spanish Disciplinary Committee for Sports (TAD)
Country
Spain
Language
Spanish
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Legal Terms
No intention to enhance performance
No Significant Fault or Negligence
Period of ineligibility
Principle of proportionality
Other organisations
Agencia Española de Protección de la Salud en el Deporte (AEPSAD) - Spanish Agency for the Protection of Health in Sport
Analytical aspects
B sample analysis
Doping classes
S8. Cannabinoids
Substances
Cannabis (THC)
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
14 January 2016
Date of last modification
27 January 2016
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin