Science of weight loss supplements: Compromised by conflicts of interest?

Author: Ano Lobb
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 October 14; 16(38): 4880–4882.
Published online 2010 October 14. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i38.4880

Weight loss supplements often contain powerful pharmacoactive ingredients with the potential to cause harm. Trials used to determine product safety and effectiveness, meanwhile, tend to be small, of short duration, and frequently lack financial conflict of interest disclosures. These factors could conspire to place consumers at risk, especially when published research cited in advertising cloaks products with the suggestion that their safety and effectiveness have been proven by science. Examples of current and former weight loss products backed by potentially conflicted or low quality research include Metabolife-356, Hydroxycut, Xenadrine and LeptiCore. Published research, especially in the field of weight loss supplements, needs better conflict of interest disclosure, and regulators should consider how research findings are used in marketing claims.

Original document

Parameters

Education
Bodybuilders, Powerlifters & Gym Users
Coaches and Support Staff
Education Program
Educators
Elite Athletes
Medical Practitioners
Science
Review
Date
14 October 2010
People
Lobb, Ano
Country
United States of America
Language
English
Doping classes
S6. Stimulants
Various
Contamination
Supplements
Version
Current
Document category
Scientific article
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
12 September 2012
Date of last modification
4 July 2013
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin