CAS 2004_A_766 IAAF vs Athletics Australia & Stuart Lyall

CAS 2004/A/766 IAA.F v/ Athletics Australia & Stuart Lyall

In December 2001 the Australian Athlete Stuart Lyall was arrested on criminal charges for using and trafficking cocaine and ecstasy (methylenedioxymethamphetamine - MDMA). In April 2003 the Athlete pleaded guilty to the criminal charges against him and in May 2003 he was convicted on a number of counts, including the use of cocaine and trafficking ecstasy.

As a consequence of the criminal charges also anti-doping rule violations were reported against the Athlete in September 2003 followed by a number of significant admissions made by the Athlete that substantially shortened the length and lowered the cost of the hearing.

On 20 August 2004 the Athletics Austria Doping Control Tribunal decided to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete for trafficking. On 1 October 2004 the Tribunal decided to reinstate the Athlete immediately due to exceptional circumstances in this case.

Hereafter in December 2004 the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) appealed the decision of the Athletics Australia with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). The IAAF requested the Panel to set aside the decision of Athletics Australia Doping Control Tribunal of 1 October 2004 and to impose a lifetime period of ineligibility on the Athlete.

The IAAF contended that Athletics Australia has no jurisdiction to consider exceptional circumstances and to allow the Athlete’s early reinstatement.

Considering the IAAF 2000 Procedural Guidelines for Doping Control the Panel concludes that the Athletics Australia Tribunal did not have the power to reinstate the Athlete (ultra vires). In the IAAF Guidelines this power lies exclusively with the IAAF Council only.

Therefore the Court of Arbitration for Sport decides on 20 October 2005 that:

1.) The appeal filed by the IAAF on 7 December 2004 is granted.

2.) The AUS decision of 1 October 2004 is amended as follows: Mr Stuart Lyall shall be declared ineligible for life.

3.) All other claims are dismissed.

4.) This award is rendered without costs, except for the Court Office fee of CHF 500 paid by the IAAF, which is retained by the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

5.) Each party shall bear its own costs.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
CAS Appeal Awards
Date
20 October 2005
Arbitrator
Kavanagh, Tricia
Leaver, Peter
Paulsson, Jan
Original Source
Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)
Country
Australia
Language
English
ADRV
Trafficking / attempted trafficking
Legal Terms
Admission
Application for early reinstatement
Case law / jurisprudence
Competence / Jurisdiction
Criminal case / judicial inquiry
Criminal legislation
Exceptional circumstances
Lifetime period of ineligibility
Period of ineligibility
Rules & regulations International Sports Federations
Rules & regulations National Sports Organisations & National Anti-Doping Organisations
Substantial assistance
Ultra vires
Sport/IFs
Athletics (WA) - World Athletics
Other organisations
Athletics Australia (AA)
International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF)
Doping classes
S6. Stimulants
Substances
Cocaine
Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)
Medical terms
Addiction / dependence
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
4 May 2017
Date of last modification
4 July 2023
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin