CCES 2016 CCES vs Earle Connor

Related case:
SDRCC 2015 CCES vs Earle Connor
March 4, 2016

On 4 March 2016 a 4 year period of ineligibility was imposed on the Canadian Athlete Earle Connor after his samples tested positive for the prohibited substance nandrolone. The imposed sanction started on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 29 July 2015.

In May 2016 the Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport (CCES) has reported a second anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete for three whereabouts failures between May and October 2015.

After notification the Athlete failed to dispute the violation within the deadline under the Rules follows that the Athlete is deemed to have admitted the violation, to have waived his right for a hearing and to have accepted the sanction proposed by the CCES.

Because this is the Athlete’s second anti-doping rule violation the CCES decides on 16 June 2016 to impose a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on 5 June 2016.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
16 June 2016
Original Source
Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport (CCES)
Country
Canada
Language
English
ADRV
Filing failure
Missed test
Whereabouts
Legal Terms
Acceptance of sanction
Admission
Second violation
Substantial delay / lapsed time limit
Waiver of "right to be heard"
Sport/IFs
Athletics (WA) - World Athletics
Other organisations
Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport (CCES)
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
7 September 2017
Date of last modification
16 October 2019
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin