ADAPI 2016_10 INADA vs Balinder Singh - Appeal

On 5 May 2017 the Anti-Doping Disciplinary Panel of India (ADDPI) decided to impose a 4 year period of ineligibility on the powerlifter Balinder Singh after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance Testosterone and its Adiols.

Hereafter the Athlete appealed the First Instance decision on 5 May 2017 with the Anti-Doping Appeal Panel of India (ADAPI). The Athlete asserted that the positive test was caused by contaminated supplements and in support he had produced a test report from a Laboratory.

The Appeal Panel established that the filed test report was insufficient and unreliable, that the Athlete had failed to mention the supplements in question on the Doping Control Form and that the prohibited substance was used prior to the Doping Control.

Therefore on 27 August 2018 the Anti-Doping Appeal Panel decides to dismiss the Athlete’s appeal and to uphold the ADDPI decision of 5 May 2018.

show »
Type:
pdf

Parameters:

Legal
National Decisions
Date:
27 August 2018
Arbitrator
Lamba, Vinay
Mahajan, Harsh
Makhija, Vibha
Source
India National Anti-Doping Agency (INADA)
Country
India
Language
English
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Legal Terms
Circumstantial evidence
Sport/IFs
Powerlifting (IPF) - International Powerlifting Federation
Other organisations
Anti-Doping Appeal Panel of India (ADAPI)
India National Anti-Doping Agency (INADA)
Doping classes
S1. Anabolic Agents
Substances
5α-androstane-3α,17α-diol
5α-androstane-3α,17β-diol
5α-androstane-3β,17β-diol
5β-androstane-3α,17β-diol
Testosterone
Various
Contamination
Supplements
Document type
pdf
Category
  • Legal
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin