UKAD 2019 UKAD vs Mark Jones

Related case:

UKAD 2020 Mark Jones vs UKAD - Appeal
December 24, 2020

In August 2019 United Kingdom Anti-Doping (UKAD) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the amateur rugby player Mark Jones after his sample tested positive as an atypical finding for the prohibited substance Clenbuterol in a very low concentration.

After notification a provisional suspension was ordered. The Athlete filed a statement in his defence and he was heard for the National Anti-Doping Panel.

The Athlete accepted the test result, admitted the violation and denied the intentional use of the substance. At first he requested to lift the provisional suspension and later he requested to be credited for serving this provisional suspenion due to the substantial delays in the process attributed to UKAD.

The Athlete argued that there were grounds for a reduced 2 year sanction based on his prompt admission and No Significant Fault or Negligence. He alleged that meat contamination had caused the positive test due to his ingestion of cheap Australian / Chinese meat he had purchased in bulk at a market in Cardiff and consumed in the months hereafter.

UKAD deemed that there were no grounds that the Athlete had provided a prompt admission since there was only a timely admission. Further it contended that the Athlete failed to explain how the substance had entered his system nor did he  produce any corroborating evidence in support of his meat contamination allegation.

The Panel holds that there were no substantial delays in this case and agrees that the Athlete only provided a timely admission. Consequently it was prepared to start the period of ineligibility on the date of the sample collection which also credits the Athlete for the time already served during his provisional suspension.

The Panel concludes that there are no grounds for a reduced sanction since the Athlete failed to establish how the prohibited substance had entered his system nor did he provide corroborating evidence in support of his allegations.

Therefore the National Anti-Doping Panel decides on 7 February 2020 to impose a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the sample collection, i.e. on 25 April 2019.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
7 February 2020
Arbitrator
Hovell, Mark Andrew
Johnson, Lorraine
Mackenzie, Isla
Original Source
UK Anti-Doping (UKAD)
Country
United Kingdom
Language
English
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Legal Terms
Burdens and standards of proof
Case law / jurisprudence
Circumstantial evidence
Commencement of ineligibility period
Prompt / Timely Admission
Provisional suspension
Rules & regulations National Sports Organisations & National Anti-Doping Organisations
Sport/IFs
Rugby (WR) - World Rugby
Other organisations
UK Anti-Doping (UKAD)
Laboratories
London, United Kingdom: Drug Control Centre
Analytical aspects
Atypical Finding (ATF)
Doping classes
S1. Anabolic Agents
Substances
Clenbuterol
Various
Amateur / club / recreational sport
Meat contamination
Voluntary doping tests
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
3 February 2021
Date of last modification
8 February 2021
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin