ADAK 2019 ADAK vs Paul Kipkorir Kipkemoi

In April 2019 the Anti-Doping Agency of Kenya has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Paul Kipkorir Kipkemoi after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance 1,3-Dimethylbutylamine (1,3-DMBA).

After notification a provisional suspension was ordered. The Athlete filed a statement in his defence and with considerable delays in the proceedings he was heard for the Sports Disputes Tribunal of Kenya.

The Athlete denied the intentional use of the substance and argued that he was tested before since 2009 without issues. He acknowledged that he had used supplements and medication which turned out to contain the prohibited substance.

He asserted that he had cooperated with ADAK, provided information about the products he had used, and that he had mentioned these on the Doping Control Form. He had not waived his right to analyse his B Sample after the Notification and complained that due to the delays he had already served a provisional suspension of almost 2 years.

ADAK contended that the Athlete had committed an anti-doping rule violation and requested for the imposition of a sanction of 4 years. It found that the Athlete had acted negligently in using supplements and medication without any research. ADAK acknowledged that it had not notified the Athlete about his right to analyse his B Sample, nor was it analysed.

The Tribunal finds that without departures of the ISL the presence of a prohibtied substance had been established in the Athlete's A Sample and accordingly that he had committed an anti-doping rule violation. The Tribunal agrees that the B Sample analysis was not notified to the Athlete, yet hereafter during the proceedings none of the Parties had requested analysis of the B Sample.

The Tribunal accepts that the violation was not intentional and regards that the Athlete made genuine efforts to find the exact source of the prohibited substance. Further the Panel deems that the Athlete had acted negligently and considers that there were delays and omissions in the proceeding attributed to ADAK.

Therefore the Kenya Sports Disputes Tribunal decides on 7 April 2021 to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 23 April 2019. Due to the established omissions the costs of the proceedings shall be borne by ADAK.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
7 April 2021
Arbitrator
Kimani, Mary N.
Onyango, Njeri
Sifuna-Shiveka, Elynah
Original Source
Anti-Doping Agency of Kenya (ADAK)
Country
Kenya
Language
English
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Legal Terms
ADRV Notice
Case law / jurisprudence
Fair trial / procedural fairness
International Standard for Laboratories (ISL)
International Standard for Testing and Investigations (ISTI)
Negligence
No intention to enhance performance
Period of ineligibility
Procedural error
Substantial delay / lapsed time limit
Sport/IFs
Athletics (WA) - World Athletics
Other organisations
Anti-Doping Agency of Kenya (ADAK)
Laboratories
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Laboratório Brasileiro de Controle de Dopagem – LBCD – LADETEC / IQ - UFRJ
Analytical aspects
B sample analysis
Doping classes
S6. Stimulants
Substances
4-Methylpentan-2-amine (1,3-dimethylbutylamine)
Various
Supplements
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
22 April 2021
Date of last modification
2 July 2021
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin