TJD-AD 2022-001 Disciplinary Decision - Cycling

Related case:

TJD-AD 2022-005 Appeal Decision - Cycling
May 11, 2022

In December 2020 the Brazilian Doping Control Authority (ABCD) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the cyclist after her sample tested positive for the prohibited substance Enobosarm (Ostarine).

After notification a provisional suspension was ordered. The Athlete filed a statement in her defence, she refused to accept a sanction of 3 years and requested to lift the provisional suspension. The case was referred to the Brazilian Sports Justice Anti-Doping Tribunal (TJD-AD).

The Athlete believed that her prescribed supplements were contaminated or tampered in the compounding pharmacy whereas this pharmacy also failed to respond to the Athlete's submissions.

Analysis of the Athlete's supplements in question in the Rio de Janeiro Lab revealed not the presence of Ostarine. Instead the Lab established the presence of the prohibited substances Canrenone, Indapamide and Spironolactone in these supplements.

The Rio Lab reported that the Athlete's supplements were delivered in open unsealed containers and that there was no evidence of tampering. Furthermore the Lab provided an explanation regarding the detection methods for the differend substances that had been found in the Athlete's sample.

The Rapporteur finds that the presence of a prohibited substance has been established in the Athlete's sample and accordingly that she committed an anti-doping rule violation. There are also no grounds to lift the provisional suspension as requested by the Athlete.

The Rapporteur deems that without corroborating evidence the Athlete failed to demonstrate that the violation was not intentional, nor how the substance(s) had entered her system. There was no evidence of supplement contamination, nor evidence that the analysed supplements in question were purchased by her.

Following lack of cooperation from the compounding pharmacy in question the TJD-AD and ABCD requested the authorities to open an investigation into the conduct of this pharmacy. Ultimately the compounding pharmacy provided the requested documentation.

After assessment of this documentation it was not possible to determine that the Athlete's supplements had been contaminated in this pharmacy. Because of the risk of using compounding supplements the Rapporteur regards that the Athlete possibly acted negligently.

Therefore the TJD-AD Panel decides on 18 March 2022 to impose a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the sample collection, i.e. on 31 October 2020.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
18 March 2022
Arbitrator
Contini, Marcello Lima
Rocha, Selma Fátima Melo
Sabioni, Paulo Rogério Oliveira
Original Source
Brazilian Sports Justice Anti-Doping Tribunal (TJD-AD)
Country
Brazil
Language
Portuguese
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Legal Terms
Burdens and standards of proof
Circumstantial evidence
Provisional suspension
Sport/IFs
Football (FIFA) - International Football Federation
Other organisations
Autoridade Brasileira de Controle de Dopagem (ABCD) - Brazilian Doping Control Authority
Tribunal de Justiça Desportiva Antidopagem (TJD-AD) - Brazilian Sports Justice Anti-Doping Tribunal
Laboratories
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Laboratório Brasileiro de Controle de Dopagem – LBCD – LADETEC / IQ - UFRJ
Analytical aspects
Reliability of the testing method / testing result
Doping classes
S1. Anabolic Agents
S5. Diuretics and Other Masking Agents
Substances
Canrenone
Enobosarm (ostarine)
Indapamide
Selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs)
Spironolactone
Various
Lack of cooperation / obstruction
Supplements
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
25 July 2022
Date of last modification
7 November 2022
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin