SAIDS 2015_11 Cole Henning vs SAIDS - Appeal

Related cases:

  • SAIDS 2015_11 SAIDS vs Cole Henning
    February 8, 2016
  • CAS 2016_A_4716 Cole Henning vs SAIDS
    March 9, 2017

On 8 February 2016 the South Africa Independent Doping  Hearing Panel (IDHP) decided to impose a 4 year period of ineligibility on the MMA Athlete Cole Henning after he tested positive for the prohibited substance Methylhexaneamine (dimethylpentylamine).

In first instance the Panel concluded that the Athlete acted intentionally and failed in his responsibility to ensure that no prohibited substance enters his system. Hereafter the Athlete appealed this Decision with the Anti-Doping Appeal Committee of South Africa.

The Athlete requested the Appeal Committee to set aside the Appealed Decision and to impose a reduced sanction. He argued that the IDHP and its Appealed Decision was erroneous and that there are grounds for no Significant Fault or Negligence.

The Athlete admitted the violation and denied the intentional use of the substance. He asserted that the substances Methylhexaneamine or Dimethylpentylamine were not listed as ingredient on the label of the supplement TNT-Mercury Napalm he had used.

SAIDS contended that the Athlete acted intentionally because his conduct was reckless or alternatively was significantly negligent.

The Appeal Committee finds that the presence of a prohibited substance has been established in the Athlete's sample and accordingly that he committed an anti-doping rule violation. Further the Committee holds that not had been demonstrated that the supplement TNT-Mercury Napalm was the source of the positive test, nor how the prohibited substance has entered his system.

The Appeal Committee did not accept the Athlete's assertions and deemed that he acted intentionally. The Committee finds that the Athlete muse have known that there was a significant risk that his conduct might result in an anti-doping rule violation and manifestly disregarded that risk.

Therefore the Appeal Committee decides on 8 July 2016 to dismiss the Athlete's appeal and to uphold the Appealed Decision to impose a sanction of 4 years on the Athlete.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
8 July 2016
Arbitrator
Hack, Raymond
Ledwaba, Metja
Nematswerani, Ephraim
Original Source
South African Institute for Drug-Free Sport (SAIDS)
Country
South Africa
Language
English
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Legal Terms
Admission
Intent
Negligence
Sport/IFs
Mixed Martial Arts
Other organisations
EFC Worldwide (Extreme Fighting Championship)
South African Institute for Drugfree Sport (SAIDS)
Laboratories
Bloemfontein, South Africa: South African Doping Control Laboratory
Doping classes
S6. Stimulants
Substances
4-Methylhexan-2-amine (methylhexaneamine, 1,3-dimethylamylamine, 1,3 DMAA)
Various
Supplements
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
1 November 2022
Date of last modification
8 December 2022
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin