AFLD 2016 FFC vs Respondent M04

On 24 June 2015 the French Cycling Federation (FCC) Appeal Panel decided to impose a 1 year period of ineligibility on the cyclist after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance Triamcinolone acetonide.

Hereafter the case was reopened by the French Anti-Doping Agency (AFLD). Following notification the Athlete filed a statement in his defence and failed to attend the hearing.

The AFLD finds that the presence of a prohibited substance has been established in the Athlete's sample and accordingly that he committed an anti-doping rule violation. 

The AFLD determines that the Athlete had mentioned his medication on th Doping Control Form and that his application for a TUE was denied in March 2015. The AFLD deems that the Athlete failed to explain how he obtained this medication, nor did he provide a medical justification for the use of this medication.

Therefore the AFLD decides on 7 January 2016 to impose a 2 year period of ineligiblity on the Athlete.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
7 January 2016
Original Source
French Anti-Doping Agency (AFLD)
Country
France
Language
French
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Sport/IFs
Cycling (UCI) - International Cycling Union
Other organisations
Agence Française de Lutte contre le Dopage (AFLD) - French Anti-Doping Agency
Fédération Française de Cyclisme (FFC) - French Cycling Federation
Laboratories
Paris, France: Agence Française de Lutte contre le Dopage (AFLD)
Doping classes
S9. Glucocorticosteroids
Substances
Triamcinolone acetonide
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
12 February 2024
Date of last modification
3 April 2024
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin