Used filter(s): 439 items found

  • Remove all filters
  • Search all: Baseball

Dopingautoriteit Annual Report 2019 (Netherlands)

10 Apr 2020

Dopingautoriteit Annual Report 2019 (Netherlands) / Anti-doping Authority Netherlands (Dopingautoriteit). - Capelle aan den IJssel : Dopingautoriteit, 2020

Contents:

Chapter 1 – Education
Chapter 2 – Doping Control
Chapter 3 – Intelligence & Investigations
Chapter 4 – Disciplinary Proceedings
Chapter 5 – Legal Affairs
Chapter 6 – Scientific Research
Chapter 7 – Knowledge Management
Chapter 8 – Therapeutic Use Exemptions
Chapter 9 – International Affairs
Chapter 10 – People & Organisation
--------------------------
Annex 1 - Financial overview
Annex 2 - Members of the Advisory Board and Committees
Annex 3 - Office staff
Annex 4 - Overview of publications and presentations
Annex 5 - Secondary positions
Annex 6 - Abbreviations

NADA Austria Annual Report 2019

31 Mar 2020

Jaresbericht 2019 / Natonale Anti-Doping Agentur Austria (NADA Austria). - Wien : NADA Austria, 2020

Contents:

NADA Austria

  • Leitbild, Vision und Mission
  • Kommissionen
  • Mitarbeiter
  • Nationale und internationale Kooperationen

DopingkontrollSystem

  • Dopingkontrollprogramm 2019
  • Athlete Biological Passport Program
  • Dopingkontrollstatistik 2019

Medizin

  • Medikamentenabfrage - MedApp
  • Medizinische Ausnahmegenehmigungen

Recht

  • Investigation - Operation "Aderlass"
  • Regelwerke und Compliance
  • Verstöße gegen die Anti-Doping Bestimmungen 2019

Information & Prävention

  • International Standard for Education
  • Information
  • Online
  • Social Media
  • Vorträge und Info-Tour
  • Schulungsprogramme
  • Kampagnen und Kooperationen

Ausblick nada austria
Anlagen

WADA - Independent Observers Report Pan American Games 2019

27 Mar 2020

Report of the Independent Observers : 2019 Pan American Games, Lima, Perú / Independent Observer Team. - Montreal : World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), 2020

ADAS Annual Report 2019 (Serbia)

3 Jan 2020

ADAS Annual Report 2019 / Anti-Doping Agency of Serbia (ADAS). - Belgrade : Antidoping Agencija Republike Srbije, 2020

WADA - 2018 Anti-Doping Testing Figures Report

20 Dec 2019

2018 Anti-Doping Testing Figures / World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). - Montreal : WADA, 2019

Contents:

- Executive Summary - pp. 2-6 (5 pages)
- Laboratory Report -– pp. 7-34 (28 pages)
- Sport Report - pp. 35-159 (125 pages)
- Testing Authority Report - pp. 160-304 (145 pages)
- ABP Report-Blood Analysis - pp. 305-343 (39 pages)

WADA - 2017 Anti-Doping Rule Violations (ADRVs) Report

19 Dec 2019

2017 Anti-Doping Rule Violations (ADRVs) Report / World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). - Montreal : WADA, 2019.
- Report compiled based on cases received by WADA before 31 May 2019


This is the fifth year that WADA publishes the ADRVs Report. The Report illustrates doping offencescommitted under the World Anti-Doping Code (Code) in 2017.

The Report includes the decisions received by WADA before 31 May 2019 of all Adverse AnalyticalFindings (AAFs) for which the samples were collected by Anti-Doping Organizations (ADOs) in 2017and reported in ADAMS. This also includes Non-Analytical Anti-Doping rule violations for decisionsrendered in 2017. Discrepancy from ADOs’ published statistics may occur due to different reportingcriteria.

The ADRVs Report is divided as follows:

1.) An Introduction and an Executive Summary which provide an overview and highlight the key observations of the 2017 ADRVs Report.
2.) Sections 1 and 2 present the results management outcomes (including ADRVs) of all AAFs detected by WADA-accredited Laboratories for samples collected from athletes in- and out-of-competition in 2017. They are presented by sport, discipline (Section 1) and testing authority (Section 2).

3.) Section 3 includes ADRVs that resulted from Non-Analytical findings committed by Athletes (presented by sport and nationality) and by Athlete Support Personnel (presented by nationality).

4.) Section 4 indicates the total number of ADRVs from Athletes in 2017, which includes AAFs that resulted in an ADRV and all Non-Analytical ADRVs. The data is presented by sport andnationality.
The information is further divided into:
- Sample type (urine or blood),
- Type of test (in- or out-of-competition), and;
- Athlete gender.

Contents:

Introduction
Executive Summary
Section 1: Outcomes of 2017 AAFs by Sport Category
Section 2: Outcomes of 2017 AAFs by Testing Authority Category
Section 3: Report of 2017 Non-Analytical ADRVs
Section 4: Report of 2017 Total Analytical and Non-Analytical ADRVs

CCES Annual Report 2018-2019 (Canada)

13 Dec 2019

Annual report 2018-2019 / Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport (CCES). - Ottawa : CCES, 2019

Contents:

  • Our Message to You
  • Governance and Leadership
  • Activate
  • Advocate
  • Protect
  • Doping Control Statistics
  • Financial Report

Facial features and unethical behavior - Doped athletes show higher facial width-to-height ratios than non-doping sanctioned athletes

30 Oct 2019

Facial features and unethical behavior - Doped athletes show higher facial width-to-height ratios than non-doping sanctioned athletes / Bjoern Krenn, Callum Buehler. - (PLoSONE (2019) 30 October); p. 1-9).
- PMID: 31665155.
- PMCID: PMC6821090.
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224472


Abstract

Past research has emphasized the role of facial structures in predicting social behavior. In particular the facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) was found to be a reliable predictor for antisocial and unethical behavior. The current study was aimed at examining this association in the field of sports: FWHRs of 146 doping sanctioned athletes in athletics (37 male/38 female) and weightlifting (44 male/27 female) were compared to the fWHRs of randomly chosen non-doping sanctioned athletes of the Top Ten at the World Championship 2017 and Olympic Games 2016 in both sports (146 athletes). The results showed that doping sanctioned athletes due to the use of anabolic steroids had larger fWHRs than non-doping sanctioned athletes. However, doping sanctioned athletes due to other doping rule violations than the use of anabolic steroids, did not show this effect. The study provides empirical evidence for the relation between fWHR and unethical behavior in a real-world setting and contributes to the discussion about fWHR’s biological origin, emphasizing the role of anabolic steroids. A mutual interaction between fWHR and doping behavior is discussed, at which a larger fWHR might signify a higher tendency to behave unethically, whereas the consequential intake of anabolic steroids might also shape individuals’ faces.

Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin