Swiss Federal Court 4A_620_2009 Ekaterina Iourieva & Albina Akhatova vs IBU

Related cases:

  • CAS 2009_A_1931 Ekaterina Iourieva & Albina Akhatova vs IBU
    November 12, 2009
  • IBU 2009 IBU vs Albina Akhatova
    August 11, 2009
  • IBU 2009 IBU vs Ekaterina Iourieva
    August 11, 2009
  • IBU 2013 IBU vs Ekaterina Iourieva
    July 14, 2014
  • IBU 2014 IBU vs Ekaterina Iourieva
    June 30, 2015

In December 2008 the International Biathlon Union (IBU) reported an anti-doping rule violation against the two Russian Athletes Ekaterina Iourieva and Albina Akhatova after their A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substance recombinant human erythropoetin (rhEPO).

After notifitcation a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athletes were heard for the IDU Doping Hearing Panel. Consequently on 11 August 2009 the ISU Doping Hearing Panel decided to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athletes Ekaterina Iourieva and Albina Akhatova, starting on the date of the sample collection.

Hereafter in August 2009 the Athletes appealed the IBU decision of 11 August 2009 with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). The Athletes requested the CAS Panel to set aside the Appealed Decision and requested for a reduced sanction. 

They argued that the laboratory failed to analyse the samples and to report the test results in conformity with the 2008 ISL and related Technical Documents (TD).

The CAS Panel determindes that there had been no departures from the applicable ISL and its accompanying technical documents. Without diminishing the importance of improvement in the future the aspect of meeting the “Documentation and Reporting” aspects of the ISL and the description of the analytical finding, the Adverse Analytical Finding (AAF) of the Lab in this case can be fully relied upon by the sanctioning and reviewing bodies.

Therefore the Court of Arbitration for Sport on 7 May 2010 that:

1.) The Appeal of Ms Ekaterina Iourieva and Ms Albina Akatova is dismissed.

2.) The award is pronounced without costs, except for the Court Office fee of CHF 500 (five hundred Swiss Francs) paid by the Appellants, which is retained by the CAS.

3.) Ms Ekaterina Iourieva and Ms Albina Akatova shall each pay the IBU a contribution towards the legal fees of the IBU in the amount of CHF 2,500 (two thousand five hundred Swiss Francs), within 30 (thirty) days of notification of this award.



Hereafter the Athletes appealed the CAS decision of 12 November 2009 with the Swiss Federal Court. The Athletes argued that the CAS Panel breached their right to be heard and the principles of lex mitior and non-retroactivity of standards.

Nevertheless the Swiss Federal Court rejected the complaints and arguments of the Athletes and decides on 7 May 2010 to dismiss their appeal.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
Civil Court Decisions
Federal Court Decisions
Date
7 May 2010
Arbitrator
Corboz, Bernard
Kiss, Christina
Klett, Kathrin
Kolly, Gilbert
Rottenberg Liatowitsch, Vera
Original Source
Swiss Federal Court
Country
Russian Federation
Language
English
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Legal Terms
Fair trial / procedural fairness
International Standard for Laboratories (ISL)
Lex mitior
Public policy
Sport/IFs
Biathlon (IBU) - International Biathlon Union
Laboratories
Lausanne, Switzerland: Laboratoire Suisse d’Analyse du Dopage
Seibersdorf, Austria: Seibersdorf Labor GmbH Doping Control Laboratory
Analytical aspects
B sample analysis
Doping classes
S2. Peptide Hormones, Growth Factors
Substances
Erythropoietin (EPO)
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
29 July 2014
Date of last modification
20 June 2023
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin