AFLD 2014 FFF vs Respondent M28

Facts
The French Football Federation (Fédération Française de Football, FFF) charges respondent M28 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on October 9, 2013, respondent refuses to attend the doping control.

History
The respondent in his capacity as physician of the team doesn't want to wait to protect the health of its players, waiting, sweating, rain and in the cold, asking them to go recover in the locker room to take warm clothing before returning and sign the doping control form, he expressed on a sharp tone of his displeasure at the samplers reproach which was intimidating and aggressive. However the way the players were selected for the doping control was doubtful. This was recognized by the sampler.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision (a warning) dated November 18, 2013, of the disciplinary committee of the FFF is cancelled.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
30 April 2014
Original Source
French Anti-Doping Agency (AFLD)
Country
France
Language
French
ADRV
Refusal or failure to submit to sample collection
Legal Terms
Acquittal
Procedural error
Sport/IFs
Football (FIFA) - International Football Federation
Other organisations
Agence Française de Lutte contre le Dopage (AFLD) - French Anti-Doping Agency
Fédération Française de Football (FFF) - French Football Federation
Laboratories
Paris, France: Agence Française de Lutte contre le Dopage (AFLD)
Various
Athlete support personnel
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
18 August 2014
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin