Appealed case:
ISR 2010 KNBB Decision Disciplinary Committee 2010075 T
June 1, 2011
Related cases:
ISR 2010 KNBB Preliminary Decision Disciplinary Committee 2010075 TU1
March 21, 2011
ISR 2010 KNBB Preliminary Decision Disciplinary Committee 2010075 TU2
April 5, 2011
The Royal Dutch Billiards Association (KNBB) has reported against this person for violating the Anti-Doping Rules of the ISR. In the A portion of the urine sample concerned is the prohibited substance benzoylecgonine (cocaine metabolite) and cocaine. In the interlocutory judgment, the Disciplinary Commission opinion on the defence of the person concerned, that the positive results of the sample is not legally valid in connection with the small amount of urine produced, maintained. The Disciplinary Committee has written ruling.
The "first sample" had a too low specific gravity and the "second sample" contained less (60 ml) than the prescribed quantity of urine (90 ml). The declaration in this disciplinary case is based on the results of the analysis of the second sample. Unlike the lawyer concerned in his defence suggests, make deviations from the DR or the IST not demonstrably led to the Adverse Analytical Finding The audit results are not valid. The prescribed amount of 90 ml is primarily dictated that there is not enough in order to prevent urine would be available in some specific cases, in which a number of additional analyzes to be carried out. This was in this case no. The "first sample" was also suitable to be analyzed. Here, too, in the A-part of cocaine. Shall have the doping control form, which clearly indicated that only 60 ml was produced, signed and checked on the form that he agreed with the procedure. The Disciplinary Committee considers the offense sufficiently plausible.
For concerned this is a second doping offense. Such cases are punishable by a period of exclusion for a period of at least eight years and a maximum of life imprisonment. The Disciplinary Committee is of the opinion that the person using cocaine the league has not seriously distorted. But there is evidence of a violation of doping rules. An exclusion of eight years in the eyes of the Disciplinary Commission to adjust. To the handling of this case costs are borne by individual charged.
