TJD-AD 2019-009 Appeal Decision - Football

Related case:

TJD-AD 2019-009 Disciplinary Decision - Football
August 18, 2020

Previously the football player was sanctioned for 2 years after he tested positive for the prohibited substances Furosemide and Sibutramine.

  • This particular case is not based on pure antidoping legislation, but in a Brazilian sports code rule that states that no athlete could pursue measures on Judiciary system before sports instances are exhausted.
  • The article (art. 231 of Brazilian Sports Justice Code) states that “pursue, before exhausting all sports justice instances, before the Judiciary system any matter related to sport discipline or competitions or have benefit from measures taken by third-parties” is sanctioned with: withdraw from the competition the athlete is taking part at and fine from R$ 100,00 (hundred reais) a R$ 100.000,00 (hundred thousand reais).
  • It was found applicable by interpreting the first article of Brazilian Antidoping Code, that states, in its sole paragraph: “it’s considered a violation before Brazilian Antidoping Court not to comply with or delay the complying of decision, resolution, ordinance or agreement by Antidoping Court” (art. 1o, p.u.). The sanction is just a fine, in the same amount mentioned above.
  • In this case, the athlete has presented a request before the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) and, at the same time, tried to lift an antidoping violation sanction before Brazilian Judiciary system.
  • The first instance of Brazilian Antidoping Court has declared itself incompetent for the matter and decided to send the case for analyses and trial of Brazilian Soccer specialized Court for disciplinary issues, since It considered the case to be only a disciplinary matter, not an antidoping issue.
  • Nonetheless, the Brazilian Appeal Court decided differently and declared itself competent for the matter, insisting it was connected to antidoping, and because of that it should attract the competence of Brazilian Antidoping Court, as stated on Brazilian Sports Law.
  • In the merit, the Brazilian Appeal Court decided that the athlete did not commit any fault, since he had already exhausted Brazilian antidoping court instances before trying to defy the matter before the Judiciary System. The matter was already at CAS, it’s not part of Brazilian sports jurisdiction.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
21 May 2021
Arbitrator
Miranda, Martinho Neves
Moura, Humberto Fernandes
Nicolau, Jean Eduardo Batista
Sabioni, Paulo Rogério Oliveira
Original Source
Brazilian Sports Justice Anti-Doping Tribunal (TJD-AD)
Country
Brazil
Language
Portuguese
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Legal Terms
Absence of jurisdiction
Anti-Doping legislation
Competence / Jurisdiction
Fine
Sports legislation
Sport/IFs
Football (FIFA) - International Football Federation
Other organisations
Tribunal de Justiça Desportiva Antidopagem (TJD-AD) - Brazilian Sports Justice Anti-Doping Tribunal
Doping classes
S5. Diuretics and Other Masking Agents
S6. Stimulants
Substances
Furosemide
Sibutramine
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
12 October 2021
Date of last modification
9 February 2023
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin