NRB 2006 NRB Decision Disciplinary Committee 2006126 T

The Dutch Rugby (NRB) League reports a violation of the Anti-Doping Code, a doping test revealed the prohibited substance carboxy-THC.
The oral hearing was on April 12, 2006, the defendant also attended the hearing.
The Disciplinary Committee is qualified to handle the case.
The defendant didn't ask for a B-sample analyses which makes the A-sample officially declared positive
In his written defence and orally at the hearing the defendant declared that het didn't knew that cannabis was a prohibited substance. The NRB and his association never gave any information on this issue. He also didn't use this substance to enhance his performance in sport.
The Disciplinary Committee is qualified to handle the case.
The defendant didn't ask for a B-sample analyses which makes the A-sample officially declared positive.
In his written defence and orally at the hearing the defendant declared that he didn't knew that cannabis was a prohibited substance. The NRB and his association never gave any information on this issue. He also didn't use this substance to enhance his performance in sport.
The Disciplinary Committee agrees although cannabis is on the list of prohibited substances it was not used to enhance the performance in sport. Also the NRB and the association made errors in the information supply.
Cannabis is a prohibited substance, the use of it gives a bad signal to people who participate in sports, although it doesn’t enhance the sport abilities, for that reason the award will be a warning and a reprimand. If the defendant ever is tested again positive for this substance the period of ineligibility will be 2 years.
An appeal can be made within 21 day at the CAS.
The Disciplinary Committee agrees although Cannabis is on the list of prohibited substances it was not used to enhance the performance in sport. Also the NRB and the association made errors in the information supply.
Cannabis is a prohibited substance for that reason the award will be a warning and a reprimand. If the defendant ever is tested again positive for this substance the period of ineligibility will be 2 years.
An appeal can be made within 21 day at the CAS.

Original document

Parameters

Legal Source
National Decisions
Date
12 April 2007
Arbitrator
Eijndhoven, O.J.H.M. van
Hulster, A.S.
Kessel, F.
Original Source
Doping Authority Netherlands
Country
Netherlands
Language
Dutch
ADRV
Adverse Analytical Finding / presence
Legal Terms
No intention to enhance performance
Reprimand / warning
Sport/IFs
Rugby (WR) - World Rugby
Other organisations
Dopingautoriteit - Anti-Doping Authority Netherlands (ADAN)
NRB - Nederlandse Rugby Bond
Laboratories
Cologne, Germany: Institute of Biochemistry - German Sport University Cologne
Doping classes
S8. Cannabinoids
Substances
Cannabis (THC)
Document type
Pdf file
Date generated
5 June 2013
Date of last modification
28 November 2014
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin