AFLD 2010 FFC vs Respondent M06

21 Jan 2010

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M06 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on May 17, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisolone and prednisone which are regarded as prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. These substances are regarded as a specified substances.

History
The cause of the positive test is medication the respondent uses to treat allergy. He has reports which show the results of allergy tests.

Decision
1. The decision, dated October 16, 2009, of the disciplinary committee of the FFC should be modified (a warning was given).
2. The sanction will be a period of ineligibility of one month.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2010 FFBT vs Respondent M47

2 Sep 2010

Facts
The French Federation of Ball-Trap and Ball Shooting (Fédération Française de Ball-Trap et de Tir a Balle, FFBT) charges respondent M47 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on June 28, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of hydrochlorothiazide. Hydrochlorothiazide is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent admits in writing the use of the prohibited substance, but denies that there was intention to enhance athletic performance.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision will start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2010 FFBT vs Respondent M08

21 Jan 2010

Facts
The French Federation of Ball-Trap and Ball Shooting (Fédération Française de Ball-Trap et de Tir a Balle, FFBT) charges respondent M08 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on July 19, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of metabolites of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent admits in writing the use of the prohibited substance, but denies that there was intention to enhance athletic performance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a four monhts period of ineligibility in which respondent can't take part in competition or sport manifestations organized or authorized by the FFBT.
2. The decision will start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2010 FFBT vs Respondent M05

21 Jan 2010

Facts
The French Federation of Ball-Trap and Ball Shooting (Fédération Française de Ball-Trap et de Tir a Balle, FFBT) charges respondent M05 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on June 14, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of metabolites of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent used the prohibited substance two days before the doping control. There was no intention to enhance sport performance, the use was in a recreational setting.

Decision
1. The sanction is a four months period of ineligibility in which respondent can't take part in competition or sport manifestations organized or authorized by the FFBT.
2. The decision will start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2010 FFBoxe vs Respondent M55

14 Oct 2010

Facts
The French Boxing Federation (Fédération Française de Boxe, FFBoxe) - charges respondent M55 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on December 19, 2009, a sample for a doping test purposes was taken. The sample tested positive on a metabolite of Cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list, it is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used the prohibited substance in a private setting do deal with some personal problems she faced. There was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFBoxe.
2.. The period of ineligibility should be reduced by the period already served by the decision (3 months period of ineligibility), dated March 30, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFBoxe.
4. The decision, dated March 30, 2010, by the appeal committee of the FFBoxe should be modified.
5. The decision starts on the date of notification.
6. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2010 FFBB vs Respondent M73

2 Dec 2010

Facts
The French Basketball Federation (Fédération Française de Basket-Ball, FFBB) charges respondent M73 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on April 10, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisone and prednisolone. Prednisone and prednisolone are prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and they are regarded as specified substances.

History
The respondent had used medication which contained the prohibited substances to treat his wisdom teeth a week before the doping control. He had a copy of the order for surgery and a pharmaceutical prescription which shows the prohibited substance. The panel doesn't recognize the produced documents as therapeutic justification for the medication, also the use wasn't mentioned during the doping control.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFBB.
2. The decision dated June 22, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFBB should be cancelled.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2010 FFBB vs Respondent M53

7 Oct 2010

Facts
The French Basketball Federation (Fédération Française de Basket-Ball, FFBB) charges respondent M53 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on January 23, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent uses the prohibited substance occasionally in a recreational setting, there was no intention to enhance sport performance especially because he practice the sport on a modest level and plays it for his pleasure.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of four months, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFBB.
2. The decision (two months period of ineligibility), dated April 7, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFBB should be cancelled.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2010 FFBB vs Respondent M46

2 Sep 2010

Facts
The French Basketball Federation (Fédération Française de Basket-Ball, FFBB) charges respondent M46 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on October 24, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisolone. Prednisolone is prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent used medication against mite allergy and chronic rhinitis, which was the cause of the positive test. He has two medical certificates for this and the results of an allergy test to prove his condition.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision (a warning), dated January 6, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFBB should be modified.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2010 FFBB vs Respondent M43

2 Sep 2010

Facts
The French Basketball Federation (Fédération Française de Basket-Ball, FFBB) charges respondent M43 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on October 24, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The sanction, dated January 6, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the committee is disqualification from participation for four meetings at competitions and events organized sports or authorized by FFBB. However the respondent didn't give any information about how the prohibited substance had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent is excluded from competition for four times.
2. The decision, dated January 6, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFBB should be modified.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2010 FFBB vs Respondent M38

3 Jun 2010

Facts
The French Basketball Federation (Fédération Française de Basket-Ball, FFBB) charges respondent M38 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on October 24, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used cannabis in a recreational setting. There was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of four months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFBB.
2. The decision (3 months period of ineligibility), dated January 27, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFBB should be modified. The period already served leaves a remaining time period of 30 hours.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin